And I thought it was common knowledge that the more screen real-estate you have, the more work you can do for the same amount of time. A published article from the Wall Street Journal says it true, but to a certain number of inches.
The magic number seems to be 24.
Researchers at the University of Utah tested how quickly people performed tasks like editing a document and copying numbers between spreadsheets while using different computer configurations: one with an 18-inch monitor, one with a 24-inch monitor and with two 20-inch monitors. Their finding: People using the 24-inch screen completed the tasks 52% faster than people who used the 18-inch monitor; people who used the two 20-inch monitors were 44% faster than those with the 18-inch ones. There is an upper limit, however: Productivity dropped off again when people used a 26-inch screen. (source)
And I thought a 24-inch monitor was an overkill. My money is on dual-monitors though. More horizontal space is better than additional screen height. Ever since I got my second monitor, all I ended up was watching more downloaded vids from bittorent, running Joost or vidcasts from Revision3.
So, size really matters, huh?
Hello there, just browsing for information for my Utah 4g site. Lots of information out there. Not what I was looking for, but great site. Have a great day.