Comments on: What to NOT blog about?

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:53:22 +0000

Blogging about something you know nothing about is the worst thing in the world. So yeah, don’t blog about that, or, you can fake it, just make sure you get away with it.

By: Donkey Kang

Donkey Kang — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:17:05 +0000

I do think you should brag about new gadgets that you buy. Who agrees with me on this one?

By: vance

vance — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:06:37 +0000

hmm? Legal and medical advises are sometime generic enoough be blog about just not about the on going trials.. You can give legal advise naman diba plus you can use a nickname if you don’t want everyone to know who you are..

By: nash

nash — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:21:45 +0000

I disagree with this and it’s really annoying for people to preach about what not and what not to blog about.

Blog whatever. It’s a blog.

Critical reading and thinking - it applies to all formats, be it a blog, newspaper, or book.

Stupid readers will look for weather forecasts on blogs, sensible ones to go a news site.

Leave blogs alone! Focus on readers (not just of blogs) developing their critical thinking skills!

By: BrianB

BrianB — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:49:54 +0000

Please,

If you live where I live, this is nothing new; it’s not even interesting, except for that Philippine- hong konger. That’s interesting. The details described by Brian is so-oh cliche. My mother have told me many times. Never hang out with the super rich.

By: Please

Please — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:45:39 +0000

No-no topics in blogging:

1) anything that would jeopardize personal safety, do not blog it.

2) anything that would jeopardize personal interests, do not blog it.

3) anything derogatory about sponsors, do not blog it. (don’t bite the hand that feeds you)

what else have i missed?

By: Please

Please — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:42:45 +0000

Ah I see.

Personal interests prevail then instead of objective and truthful “journalism”.

By: BrianB

BrianB — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:53:59 +0000

sorry, bad grammer, just ignore the last “with.”

Anyway, hope this doesn’t get aired on TV or we will be witnessing what of the pukiest snowjobs in the history of our country.

By: BrianB

BrianB — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:48:32 +0000

Please,

You got to understand. Celine’s family live, has mansions on the island where Abe grew up. The family dominates that island, along with a couple others with whom they seasonally trade government posts with.

By: minor

minor — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:47:37 +0000

….to blog or not to blog

By: BrianB

BrianB — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:42:14 +0000

So, that’s why you didn’t blog about your kababayan in guimaras. I’m so sorry about Celine. She seemed okay, not mataray or anything.

By: Dexter | Techathand.net

Dexter | Techathand.net — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:38:00 +0000

One should not blog and claim something that he don’t know. or face the consequence later on..

By: noemi

noemi — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:14:23 +0000

one is free to blog about any topic but be ready for the consequences whatever they may be.

example, be ready to be sued for libel if you quote portions of that controversial blog (who incidentally is not a Filipino citizen or even of Filipino descent).

By: Please

Please — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:47:04 +0000

Private individuals? When you parade your high profile face at every imaginable glossy and broadsheet in town and have endorsement deals left and right, does that make one a “private individual”?

It’s funny how not a single one of the “big bloggers” covered the most controversial pinoy blog as of late. 250,000 visitors in 4 days.

Biased? Personal interests? Scared it might get back to you in the future? Fear?

Please.