<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to divorce Wikipedia for Knol?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/</link>
	<description>Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Knol launched; Day One Spammin &#38; Jammin &#124; YugaTech &#124; Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-244041</link>
		<dc:creator>Knol launched; Day One Spammin &#38; Jammin &#124; YugaTech &#124; Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-244041</guid>
		<description>[...] Google officially launched Knol to the public. We&#8217;ve almost forgotten about Google&#8217;s attempt to supplant Wikipedia in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google officially launched Knol to the public. We&#8217;ve almost forgotten about Google&#8217;s attempt to supplant Wikipedia in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acronyms</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-215628</link>
		<dc:creator>Acronyms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-215628</guid>
		<description>I don't think so. The model is wrong. Too much biased info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so. The model is wrong. Too much biased info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caspian Graca Da Silva</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209841</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspian Graca Da Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209841</guid>
		<description>hey, i agree with what Eugene has already said

"It seems to be a Mahalo-killer to me.

My opinion is that both Knol and Wikipedia can co-exist. Besides, Wikipedians can collect the information from the Knol articles and use it to improve Wikipedia articles."

the only problem i see with wikipedia at the moment is that there is a lot of unconfirmed information, which isn't always a bad thing, but sometimes people publish incorrect infomation, i think google's plans for this opertaion is to check all information before being published, which is great, especially for people like me at college, that do a lot of research.

so yes, if this takes off, both Knol and Wikipedia will both co-exist just fine, and i wouldn't say this is so much of a competitive stand point for google but more of a co-opertive point.

hope my feedback's helped in anyway.

see ya around, merry christmas! :D

- Caspian Graca Da Silva</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, i agree with what Eugene has already said</p>
<p>&#8220;It seems to be a Mahalo-killer to me.</p>
<p>My opinion is that both Knol and Wikipedia can co-exist. Besides, Wikipedians can collect the information from the Knol articles and use it to improve Wikipedia articles.&#8221;</p>
<p>the only problem i see with wikipedia at the moment is that there is a lot of unconfirmed information, which isn&#8217;t always a bad thing, but sometimes people publish incorrect infomation, i think google&#8217;s plans for this opertaion is to check all information before being published, which is great, especially for people like me at college, that do a lot of research.</p>
<p>so yes, if this takes off, both Knol and Wikipedia will both co-exist just fine, and i wouldn&#8217;t say this is so much of a competitive stand point for google but more of a co-opertive point.</p>
<p>hope my feedback&#8217;s helped in anyway.</p>
<p>see ya around, merry christmas! <img src='http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>- Caspian Graca Da Silva</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ordnacin</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209419</link>
		<dc:creator>Ordnacin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209419</guid>
		<description>All hail Google...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All hail Google&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annon</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209388</link>
		<dc:creator>annon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209388</guid>
		<description>Well lets hope Google only allows experts to write about things or at lest proof read everything. Google isn’t in the black because Wikipedia is useless! it’s a nice idea but anyone can edit it. So if your writing a newspaper or teaching you can’t use it unless you know the subject and can proof read it first which means you need to know the subject. So any decent school or newspaper can’t use it. It’s great if your interested in something and don’t need it to be 100% accurate but other than that useless. If they started getting experts to proof read then Wikipedia would be great but until they do that it’s not a lot of use. Who ever starts something with accurate information for free can not be the bad guy. Wikipedia could be great if they would just gets some experts to proof read things first!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well lets hope Google only allows experts to write about things or at lest proof read everything. Google isn’t in the black because Wikipedia is useless! it’s a nice idea but anyone can edit it. So if your writing a newspaper or teaching you can’t use it unless you know the subject and can proof read it first which means you need to know the subject. So any decent school or newspaper can’t use it. It’s great if your interested in something and don’t need it to be 100% accurate but other than that useless. If they started getting experts to proof read then Wikipedia would be great but until they do that it’s not a lot of use. Who ever starts something with accurate information for free can not be the bad guy. Wikipedia could be great if they would just gets some experts to proof read things first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berlin</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209385</link>
		<dc:creator>Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209385</guid>
		<description>one more

Google's OpenSocial to challenge the Facebook API -well it's not going well either, not to mention Facebook's traffic left Google Orkut in the dust in September.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one more</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s OpenSocial to challenge the Facebook API -well it&#8217;s not going well either, not to mention Facebook&#8217;s traffic left Google Orkut in the dust in September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: berlin</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209384</link>
		<dc:creator>berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209384</guid>
		<description>Knol is a response to Wikipedia's founder Jimbo Wale challenging Google with Search Wikia. 

Google Answer - shut down - Ask Yahoo wins
Google Checkout -  no traction -  Paypal wins
Google Finance - no traction - Yahoo Finance wins
Google Chat - Yahoo IM rules

Google Android - To challenge iPhone - We'll see.

Playing catch-up like MS is for teh lose.
Zune 2 is sold out but it came too late in the game
Xbox is the only thing they've got going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knol is a response to Wikipedia&#8217;s founder Jimbo Wale challenging Google with Search Wikia. </p>
<p>Google Answer - shut down - Ask Yahoo wins<br />
Google Checkout -  no traction -  Paypal wins<br />
Google Finance - no traction - Yahoo Finance wins<br />
Google Chat - Yahoo IM rules</p>
<p>Google Android - To challenge iPhone - We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>Playing catch-up like MS is for teh lose.<br />
Zune 2 is sold out but it came too late in the game<br />
Xbox is the only thing they&#8217;ve got going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeline</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209377</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209377</guid>
		<description>I always hated wikipedia. Regardless if Knol is a success or not, I still think Google could replace Wikipedia with the dumbest defintions from the Urbandictionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always hated wikipedia. Regardless if Knol is a success or not, I still think Google could replace Wikipedia with the dumbest defintions from the Urbandictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209367</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209367</guid>
		<description>It seems to be a Mahalo-killer to me.

My opinion is that both Knol and Wikipedia can co-exist. Besides, Wikipedians can collect the information from the Knol articles and use it to improve Wikipedia articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be a Mahalo-killer to me.</p>
<p>My opinion is that both Knol and Wikipedia can co-exist. Besides, Wikipedians can collect the information from the Knol articles and use it to improve Wikipedia articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skhulz &#187; &#8220;Google to divorce Wikipedia for Knol?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209360</link>
		<dc:creator>skhulz &#187; &#8220;Google to divorce Wikipedia for Knol?&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209360</guid>
		<description>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptGoogle to divorce Wikipedia for Knol? Published by: yuga under: Gooooogle. 1 reply posted: 2 hours, 9 minutes ago. (Visited 82 times) Since time immemorial, Google has always had a love affair with Wikipedia. Tons of Google search results has Wikipedia on top of them and it has been estimated that 96.6% of Wikipedia pages rank on Google’s first page results. Continue reading ‘Google to divorce Wikipedia for Knol?’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptGoogle to divorce Wikipedia for Knol? Published by: yuga under: Gooooogle. 1 reply posted: 2 hours, 9 minutes ago. (Visited 82 times) Since time immemorial, Google has always had a love affair with Wikipedia. Tons of Google search results has Wikipedia on top of them and it has been estimated that 96.6% of Wikipedia pages rank on Google’s first page results. Continue reading ‘Google to divorce Wikipedia for Knol?’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: divorce &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Google to divorce Wikipedia for Knol?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209353</link>
		<dc:creator>divorce &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Google to divorce Wikipedia for Knol?&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/gooooogle/google-to-divorce-wikipedia-for-knol/#comment-209353</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
