<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft already won the Netbook OS wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/</link>
	<description>Philippines, Tech Reviews and Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:59:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: how does remote desktop work</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-424057</link>
		<dc:creator>how does remote desktop work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-424057</guid>
		<description>I am trying to login into the Terminal Services Remote Desktop. ... but the Terminal Services ActiveX Client control is not listed as option to ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to login into the Terminal Services Remote Desktop. &#8230; but the Terminal Services ActiveX Client control is not listed as option to &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halo888</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-280258</link>
		<dc:creator>halo888</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-280258</guid>
		<description>I will install windows 7 release candidate 1 to netbooks/laptops with no os (or dual boot) for a fee. check out my multiply site for details…

http://halo8888.multiply.com/photos/album/4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will install windows 7 release candidate 1 to netbooks/laptops with no os (or dual boot) for a fee. check out my multiply site for details…</p>
<p><a href="http://halo8888.multiply.com/photos/album/4" rel="nofollow">http://halo8888.multiply.com/photos/album/4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pepe Maglutac</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-274201</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepe Maglutac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-274201</guid>
		<description>It really makes me sad that netbooks are starting to use Windows...

I myself am a big fan of the open-source idealism as a whole, and am a big supporter of linux.

But, sad as I may be, I have to agree with the article. Everyone who&#039;s ever used a computer has used XP, and most people are familiar with it. So, naturally, to follow the demands of the multitude, companies would have to cater to the consumers...

As it stands, I believe only dell still offers linux versions of their netbooks regularly and dell is, well, not too big in the Philippines.

I have to say though, when I first installed Linuz on my desktop, I struggled A LOT with it. But when I installed it on my Aspire One, it worked PERFECTLY. Just goes to show how the older netbooks are really maximized for linux performance ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really makes me sad that netbooks are starting to use Windows&#8230;</p>
<p>I myself am a big fan of the open-source idealism as a whole, and am a big supporter of linux.</p>
<p>But, sad as I may be, I have to agree with the article. Everyone who&#8217;s ever used a computer has used XP, and most people are familiar with it. So, naturally, to follow the demands of the multitude, companies would have to cater to the consumers&#8230;</p>
<p>As it stands, I believe only dell still offers linux versions of their netbooks regularly and dell is, well, not too big in the Philippines.</p>
<p>I have to say though, when I first installed Linuz on my desktop, I struggled A LOT with it. But when I installed it on my Aspire One, it worked PERFECTLY. Just goes to show how the older netbooks are really maximized for linux performance <img src='http://www.yugatech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-271387</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 05:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-271387</guid>
		<description>ASUS&#039; eee PC used Linux to bring the cost down because it was orignally planned to be THE $100 PC.  Now that netbooks have caught people&#039;s fancies and cost no longer became an issue, they felt it okay to integrate Windows again.

I think the real reason why people choose Windows over Linux is the price difference.  Free unfamiliar Linux vs. FREE (as in pirated) familiar Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASUS&#8217; eee PC used Linux to bring the cost down because it was orignally planned to be THE $100 PC.  Now that netbooks have caught people&#8217;s fancies and cost no longer became an issue, they felt it okay to integrate Windows again.</p>
<p>I think the real reason why people choose Windows over Linux is the <a href="http://pricelist.ph" target='_blank' >price</a> difference.  Free unfamiliar Linux vs. FREE (as in pirated) familiar Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMadrid</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269476</link>
		<dc:creator>iMadrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 12:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269476</guid>
		<description>They fail to recognize that there are advanced users who hack their netbooks to run MacOSX Leopard.  Popular hackintosh netbooks are MSI Wind, Dell Mini 9 and the Asus EEE PC.  The reason is Apple doesn&#039;t make netbooks yet.  Its a workable compromise but it really doesn&#039;t really feel like a Mac that came from Apple Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They fail to recognize that there are advanced users who hack their netbooks to run MacOSX Leopard.  Popular hackintosh netbooks are MSI Wind, Dell Mini 9 and the Asus EEE PC.  The reason is Apple doesn&#8217;t make netbooks yet.  Its a workable compromise but it really doesn&#8217;t really feel like a Mac that came from Apple Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269471</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 11:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269471</guid>
		<description>yup MS easily ruled the netbooks, it doesn&#039;t take long for consumers to get confused with linux operating system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup MS easily ruled the netbooks, it doesn&#8217;t take long for consumers to get confused with linux operating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ani</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269255</link>
		<dc:creator>Ani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269255</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 also requires the Intel CPU to have IVT (Intel Virtualization technology) in order for it&#039;s WinXP emulation mode to run.  No problem with the more recent netbooks since the Atom alread has IVT built in. Both those running the older Via chips are out of luck - Win7 is still Vista underneath so XP application compatiblity is still an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 also requires the Intel CPU to have IVT (Intel Virtualization technology) in order for it&#8217;s WinXP emulation mode to run.  No problem with the more recent netbooks since the Atom alread has IVT built in. Both those running the older Via chips are out of luck &#8211; Win7 is still Vista underneath so XP application compatiblity is still an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazon</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269168</guid>
		<description>&quot;let’s face it guys…

you can’t live without windows.

linux will stay as a server os no matter how media hype they do…&quot;

No, I think not. I&#039;ve been using Linux in my desktop PC for more than a year. No Windows. And I am glad for that. 

Windows 7 for netbooks is the crippled edition. I think it will create  backlash against MS when buyers find out they have to shell out more cash for a more functional Windows 7. 

For me, it&#039;s wiser to use an OS that is more secure and more economical to maintain. 

MS may have won the OS war on netbooks, but it&#039;s a 900 pound gorilla vs a 90 pound penguin. It&#039;s not even a fair fight. But since data shows that Linux is still growing in use and eating away at MS&#039;s market, I think Linux will enjoy market recognition, not dominance, in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;let’s face it guys…</p>
<p>you can’t live without windows.</p>
<p>linux will stay as a server os no matter how media hype they do…&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I think not. I&#8217;ve been using Linux in my desktop PC for more than a year. No Windows. And I am glad for that. </p>
<p>Windows 7 for netbooks is the crippled edition. I think it will create  backlash against MS when buyers find out they have to shell out more cash for a more functional Windows 7. </p>
<p>For me, it&#8217;s wiser to use an OS that is more secure and more economical to maintain. </p>
<p>MS may have won the OS war on netbooks, but it&#8217;s a 900 pound gorilla vs a 90 pound penguin. It&#8217;s not even a fair fight. But since data shows that Linux is still growing in use and eating away at MS&#8217;s market, I think Linux will enjoy market recognition, not dominance, in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Yamat</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269090</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Yamat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269090</guid>
		<description>have yuga made a write up about the window 7 beta or the just released RC? any suggestion if we should try the beta or release candidate and pay full later?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have yuga made a write up about the window 7 beta or the just released RC? any suggestion if we should try the beta or release candidate and pay full later?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loadex</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269065</link>
		<dc:creator>loadex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269065</guid>
		<description>$15 per notebook sold with WinXP?... better than having none at all if a pirated version will be used.

Linux made it almost on the mainsteam.. but reality bites.. familiarity with XP beats them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$15 per notebook sold with WinXP?&#8230; better than having none at all if a pirated version will be used.</p>
<p>Linux made it almost on the mainsteam.. but reality bites.. familiarity with XP beats them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unknown Soldier</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269042</link>
		<dc:creator>Unknown Soldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 05:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269042</guid>
		<description>let&#039;s face it guys...

you can&#039;t live without windows.

linux will stay as a server os no matter how media hype they do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s face it guys&#8230;</p>
<p>you can&#8217;t live without windows.</p>
<p>linux will stay as a server os no matter how media hype they do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unknown Soldier</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269041</link>
		<dc:creator>Unknown Soldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 05:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269041</guid>
		<description>let&#039;s face it guys... 

you can&#039;t live without windows.

linux is best for servers but not on desktop users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s face it guys&#8230; </p>
<p>you can&#8217;t live without windows.</p>
<p>linux is best for servers but not on desktop users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ani</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269038</link>
		<dc:creator>Ani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 05:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269038</guid>
		<description>Portable Ubuntu, you can have the benefits of both. Runs as a Windows task and the Ubuntu synaptics package manager works just fine :)

http://lifehacker.com/5195999/portable-ubuntu-runs-ubuntu-inside-windows

http://portableubuntu.demonccc.cloudius.com.ar/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Portable Ubuntu, you can have the benefits of both. Runs as a Windows task and the Ubuntu synaptics package manager works just fine <img src='http://www.yugatech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5195999/portable-ubuntu-runs-ubuntu-inside-windows" rel="nofollow">http://lifehacker.com/5195999/portable-ubuntu-runs-ubuntu-inside-windows</a></p>
<p><a href="http://portableubuntu.demonccc.cloudius.com.ar/" rel="nofollow">http://portableubuntu.demonccc.cloudius.com.ar/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-269017</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-269017</guid>
		<description>MONOPLY!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MONOPLY!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jhay</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268953</link>
		<dc:creator>Jhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 10:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268953</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Android OS was not meant for the netbook, rather for the mobile phone. And this would be very a very interesting fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Android OS was not meant for the netbook, rather for the mobile phone. And this would be very a very interesting fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ray Cabrera</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268947</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ray Cabrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268947</guid>
		<description>on the other hand, there has been a flurry that microsoft will cease mainstream support of vista come 2012. 

while i always like mac as an OS, to have mac on a netbook is just darn too expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on the other hand, there has been a flurry that microsoft will cease mainstream support of vista come 2012. </p>
<p>while i always like mac as an OS, to have mac on a netbook is just darn too expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianB</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268945</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268945</guid>
		<description>&quot;According to Liliputing, Microsoft makes only $15 dollars for every netbook sold with WinXP, compared to the usual $50 retail price of WinXP.&quot;

Might as well not bother. They seem to be more afraid of linux than Mac Os, and why do retail companies sell XP netbooks at such extravagant premiums?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;According to Liliputing, Microsoft makes only $15 dollars for every netbook sold with WinXP, compared to the usual $50 retail <a href="http://pricelist.ph" target='_blank' >price</a> of WinXP.&#8221;</p>
<p>Might as well not bother. They seem to be more afraid of linux than Mac Os, and why do retail companies sell XP netbooks at such extravagant premiums?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianB</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268944</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268944</guid>
		<description>you know where to get a linux netbook. Basta 8 inches o mas malaki. It has to have open office preloaded na.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know where to get a linux netbook. Basta 8 inches o mas malaki. It has to have open office preloaded na.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bintoytech</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268942</link>
		<dc:creator>bintoytech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268942</guid>
		<description>According to Liliputing, Microsoft makes only $15 dollars for every netbook sold with WinXP, compared to the usual $50 retail price of WinXP.

http://www.liliputing.com/2009/04/microsoft-makes-15-for-every-netbook-sold-with-windows-xp.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Liliputing, Microsoft makes only $15 dollars for every netbook sold with WinXP, compared to the usual $50 retail <a href="http://pricelist.ph" target='_blank' >price</a> of WinXP.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/04/microsoft-makes-15-for-every-netbook-sold-with-windows-xp.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.liliputing.com/2009/04/microsoft-makes-15-for-every-netbook-sold-with-windows-xp.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domotics</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268941</link>
		<dc:creator>Domotics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 07:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268941</guid>
		<description>nobody can beat microsoft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nobody can beat microsoft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supermamon</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268932</link>
		<dc:creator>supermamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 06:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268932</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 RC just came out. Maybe you can try it out on your experiments as well.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/download.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 RC just came out. Maybe you can try it out on your experiments as well.<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/download.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/download.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miko</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268930</link>
		<dc:creator>miko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 06:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268930</guid>
		<description>i rushed to get the eee701 when it came out. i stuck to the Xandros &quot;expert mode&quot; and really loved the relatively instant-on &amp; shut down.

i was still in school though, and i really needed MS Office to keep up with powerpoint and excel files. the open office alternatives just weren&#039;t cutting it for me, so i had to switch to XP. nLited and blackbox-shelled, though.

XP wins just for compatibility and convenience.

early reports also suggest that Windows 7 will also work for netbooks, yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i rushed to get the eee701 when it came out. i stuck to the Xandros &#8220;expert mode&#8221; and really loved the relatively instant-on &amp; shut down.</p>
<p>i was still in school though, and i really needed MS Office to keep up with powerpoint and excel files. the open office alternatives just weren&#8217;t cutting it for me, so i had to switch to XP. nLited and blackbox-shelled, though.</p>
<p>XP wins just for compatibility and convenience.</p>
<p>early reports also suggest that Windows 7 will also work for netbooks, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stonedchewy</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268927</link>
		<dc:creator>stonedchewy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 06:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268927</guid>
		<description>I agree...so hello Windows 7!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230;so hello Windows 7!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linuxguy</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/microsoft/microsoft-already-won-the-netbook-os-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-268925</link>
		<dc:creator>linuxguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7796#comment-268925</guid>
		<description>linux is not for everybody. the end!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>linux is not for everybody. the end!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

