<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Atom vs. Via Nano: Benchmark Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-vs-via-nano-benchmark-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-vs-via-nano-benchmark-results/</link>
	<description>Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucien Dominick G. Tiojanco</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-vs-via-nano-benchmark-results/comment-page-1/#comment-245693</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucien Dominick G. Tiojanco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=3828#comment-245693</guid>
		<description>I wonder how Intel Atom N330 (Dual Core) will fare against VIA Nano Dual Core as both will be manufactured using a 45nm process and thus will use the same power envelope.

For the above tests they did state that although Intel Atom consumes less energy, the total energy consumed by VIA Nano for performing tasks is still less (albeit marginally) because it accomplishes the task in less time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how Intel Atom N330 (Dual Core) will fare against VIA Nano Dual Core as both will be manufactured using a 45nm process and thus will use the same power envelope.</p>
<p>For the above tests they did state that although Intel Atom consumes less energy, the total energy consumed by VIA Nano for performing tasks is still less (albeit marginally) because it accomplishes the task in less time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atom vs Nano: Battle for Low End Supremacy &#124; Pinoy Tech Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-vs-via-nano-benchmark-results/comment-page-1/#comment-245080</link>
		<dc:creator>Atom vs Nano: Battle for Low End Supremacy &#124; Pinoy Tech Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=3828#comment-245080</guid>
		<description>[...] YugaTech: Intel Atom vs. Via Nano: Benchmark Results [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YugaTech: Intel Atom vs. Via Nano: Benchmark Results [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1knife</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-vs-via-nano-benchmark-results/comment-page-1/#comment-245019</link>
		<dc:creator>1knife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=3828#comment-245019</guid>
		<description>now, that's one to consider</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now, that&#8217;s one to consider</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle, RN</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-vs-via-nano-benchmark-results/comment-page-1/#comment-245000</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle, RN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=3828#comment-245000</guid>
		<description>Nice find. So much for the much touted Intel Atom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice find. So much for the much touted Intel Atom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
