<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Atom Z530 vs. Atom N270</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/</link>
	<description>Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:37:58 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Splitting Atoms: Choosing the Best Atom-Based Netbook &#124; Scottie's Tech.Info</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-278355</link>
		<dc:creator>Splitting Atoms: Choosing the Best Atom-Based Netbook &#124; Scottie's Tech.Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 08:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-278355</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember reading Intel&#8217;s schtick about how Pine Trail could be used in fanless netbooks? Well, there are already fanless netbooks on the market that use the US15W. Check out Yugatech.com: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember reading Intel&#8217;s schtick about how Pine Trail could be used in fanless netbooks? Well, there are already fanless netbooks on the market that use the US15W. Check out Yugatech.com: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-273466</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-273466</guid>
		<description>One difference is wattage.  According to Intel&#039;s website, the N270 draws .5 more wattage at 2.5W, where the Z530 runs at 2.0W.  More power = better performance, correct?

But the clock speed and cache size remain the same.  That&#039;s strange there&#039;s such a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One difference is wattage.  According to Intel&#8217;s website, the N270 draws .5 more wattage at 2.5W, where the Z530 runs at 2.0W.  More power = better performance, correct?</p>
<p>But the clock speed and cache size remain the same.  That&#8217;s strange there&#8217;s such a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consulta Acer One 10' Vs Dell Mini 10' - Foros de CHW</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-273118</link>
		<dc:creator>Consulta Acer One 10' Vs Dell Mini 10' - Foros de CHW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-273118</guid>
		<description>[...] es el procesador y el chipset, la solucion de Dell es mejor, consume menos, pero por otro lado el N270 tiene mejor perfomance que el Z530.  En lo que a graficos integrados se refiere, la alternativa de Dell -GMA 500- es &quot;mejor&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] es el procesador y el chipset, la solucion de Dell es mejor, consume menos, pero por otro lado el N270 tiene mejor perfomance que el Z530.  En lo que a graficos integrados se refiere, la alternativa de Dell -GMA 500- es &quot;mejor&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itai</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-269305</link>
		<dc:creator>Itai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-269305</guid>
		<description>So should i go with Z530?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So should i go with Z530?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Atom N280 vs. Atom N270 &#124; YugaTech &#124; PC Labs</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-267907</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Atom N280 vs. Atom N270 &#124; YugaTech &#124; PC Labs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-267907</guid>
		<description>[...] Also check out our comparison of the Atom Z539 vs. the N270. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also check out our comparison of the Atom Z539 vs. the N270. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myvaiop</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-266573</link>
		<dc:creator>myvaiop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-266573</guid>
		<description>The problem when running benchmarks on the Sony VAIO P is it&#039;s passive cooling (no fan for the CPU). When you put some heavy load onto the machine, e.g. running benchmarks over a longer period of time, the CPU Core temperature rises over a critical level (90° C) and the processor begins to throttle. Then it runs only with 800MHz instead of 1600Mhz.

See also page 21 of the Atom Z5xx datasheet:
http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/319535.pdf

Improved Intel® Thermal Monitor mode:
-When the on-die thermal sensor indicates that the die temperature is too high, the processor can automatically perform a transition to a lower frequency and voltage specified in a software programmable MSR.
-The processor waits for a fixed time period. If the die temperature is down to acceptable levels, an up transition to the previous frequency and voltage point occurs.
-An interrupt is generated for the up and down Intel Thermal Monitor transitions enabling better system level thermal management.

I got the same problem when running benchmarks on the VAIO P (SuperPI, CrystalMark09 etc.). Sometimes the results fluctuate more than 10% or more, so i searched for the problem. I observed the CPU-Speed during benchmarks and after some time the CPU throttles to 800MHz.

If you keep this in mind, you get nearly the same results in SuperPI as Atom N270 and N280 CPU. Here are my results:

16K - 0.828s
32K - 1.719s
64K - 3.703s
128K - 8.109s
256K - 19.046s
512K - 43.609s
1M - 97.438s
2M - 224.782s

Greetings from Thailand!
myvaiop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem when running benchmarks on the Sony VAIO P is it&#8217;s passive cooling (no fan for the CPU). When you put some heavy load onto the machine, e.g. running benchmarks over a longer period of time, the CPU Core temperature rises over a critical level (90° C) and the processor begins to throttle. Then it runs only with 800MHz instead of 1600Mhz.</p>
<p>See also page 21 of the Atom Z5xx datasheet:<br />
<a href="http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/319535.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/319535.pdf</a></p>
<p>Improved Intel® Thermal Monitor mode:<br />
-When the on-die thermal sensor indicates that the die temperature is too high, the processor can automatically perform a transition to a lower frequency and voltage specified in a software programmable MSR.<br />
-The processor waits for a fixed time period. If the die temperature is down to acceptable levels, an up transition to the previous frequency and voltage point occurs.<br />
-An interrupt is generated for the up and down Intel Thermal Monitor transitions enabling better system level thermal management.</p>
<p>I got the same problem when running benchmarks on the VAIO P (SuperPI, CrystalMark09 etc.). Sometimes the results fluctuate more than 10% or more, so i searched for the problem. I observed the CPU-Speed during benchmarks and after some time the CPU throttles to 800MHz.</p>
<p>If you keep this in mind, you get nearly the same results in SuperPI as Atom N270 and N280 CPU. Here are my results:</p>
<p>16K &#8211; 0.828s<br />
32K &#8211; 1.719s<br />
64K &#8211; 3.703s<br />
128K &#8211; 8.109s<br />
256K &#8211; 19.046s<br />
512K &#8211; 43.609s<br />
1M &#8211; 97.438s<br />
2M &#8211; 224.782s</p>
<p>Greetings from Thailand!<br />
myvaiop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atom trifft Atom: N270, N280 und Z530 im Vergleich &#187; Allgemein, Intel &#187; Netbux</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-266546</link>
		<dc:creator>Atom trifft Atom: N270, N280 und Z530 im Vergleich &#187; Allgemein, Intel &#187; Netbux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-266546</guid>
		<description>[...] Diagramm entstand aus Testdaten (1,2), die der Blog Yugatech.com in Tests erhalten hatte. Dort mussten sich die drei Atom-CPUs der [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Diagramm entstand aus Testdaten (1,2), die der Blog Yugatech.com in Tests erhalten hatte. Dort mussten sich die drei Atom-CPUs der [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Atom N270 vs. Atom N280 &#124; YugaTech &#124; Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-263037</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Atom N270 vs. Atom N280 &#124; YugaTech &#124; Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-263037</guid>
		<description>[...] Also check out our comparison of the Atom Z539 vs. the N270. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also check out our comparison of the Atom Z539 vs. the N270. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clevo Netbook, Eee Box B208, Atom Z530 vs Atom N270 &#124; Netbooks News, Hacks and HowTo's</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-262945</link>
		<dc:creator>Clevo Netbook, Eee Box B208, Atom Z530 vs Atom N270 &#124; Netbooks News, Hacks and HowTo's</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-262945</guid>
		<description>[...] about how the Z530 and N270 performs against each other? Yugatech shows its own comparison from Super Pi and the N270 comes winning in terms of power. While the Z530 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about how the Z530 and N270 performs against each other? Yugatech shows its own comparison from Super Pi and the N270 comes winning in terms of power. While the Z530 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechPinas</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-262820</link>
		<dc:creator>TechPinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 05:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-262820</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Up to 128k, the difference isn&#039;t much actually.

I read in NotebookReview that Dell chose Z to run its netbooks because the chipset runs A LOT cooler than N (so they claim) and hence, works even with minimal fan speed.

Apparently and moreso in netbooks, laptop heat and fan noise are primary concerns. This graph shows that the compromise wasn&#039;t much.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Up to 128k, the difference isn&#8217;t much actually.</p>
<p>I read in NotebookReview that Dell chose Z to run its netbooks because the chipset runs A LOT cooler than N (so they claim) and hence, works even with minimal fan speed.</p>
<p>Apparently and moreso in netbooks, laptop heat and fan noise are primary concerns. This graph shows that the compromise wasn&#8217;t much.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony Vaio P Review &#124; YugaTech &#124; Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/comment-page-1/#comment-262810</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony Vaio P Review &#124; YugaTech &#124; Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7033#comment-262810</guid>
		<description>[...] My concern is more with the heat dissipation. The core temp sits around 49 degrees centigrade on CPU idle but goes as high as 64 degrees at full CPU usage.  The Vaio P doesn&#8217;t have any exhaust fan inside (Intel Atom Z5xx are generally for embedded systems that don&#8217;t require them) but there&#8217;s a small ventillation grill on the left side, where most of the heat is coming from. {Check out the difference between an Atom Z530 and the N270} [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My concern is more with the heat dissipation. The core temp sits around 49 degrees centigrade on CPU idle but goes as high as 64 degrees at full CPU usage.  The Vaio P doesn&#8217;t have any exhaust fan inside (Intel Atom Z5xx are generally for embedded systems that don&#8217;t require them) but there&#8217;s a small ventillation grill on the left side, where most of the heat is coming from. {Check out the difference between an Atom Z530 and the N270} [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
