Comments on: Canon EOS 1D Mark IV becomes official

By: tuknenards

tuknenards — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:46:49 +0000

wow for the camera!
wow for the price as well!

only those certified photo professionals would buy this. as starters like us, settled na tayo for a Canon 500D – and this is gold na for us.

By: Kenneth

Kenneth — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:47:31 +0000

Grabe, here comes another baby.

By: Boffill

Boffill — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:28:53 +0000

A good combination for those expensive lenses to that would cost you around 400K. Whew!@

By: LeoLutero

LeoLutero — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:45:39 +0000

anybody there who knows about the Hasselblad camera. Their cheapest is about 1,000,000 pesos.

If you are into photography, you must really prepare the money,

http://www.WarpedOpinion.com

By: Nitecrawler

Nitecrawler — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:38:11 +0000

..and people who buy this type of camera do not buy this with lens kit.. They usually have 4-10 professional lenses for it already from previous/older models.. and mind you.. if think the body is expensive.. wait till you finds out the cost of each professional grade lens..

By: Nitecrawler

Nitecrawler — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:32:53 +0000

Its Expensive because this Camera will earn enough money for you to buy not just one or two cars if you have the skill to use it..

By: jaya

jaya — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:17:29 +0000

Look at the olympics or other sport events. You’d see a barrage of white lenses. Between those lenses and their photographers are the older generations of this camera (1d Mark1-III). Canon managed to capture the sports photography segment because of its great telephoto lenses and cameras like this.

Why is this camera line expensive?
-It can double as a machine gun at 10FPS so you never have to worry bout that missed shot: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKlPeh99q0o

-It’s autofocus is worlds apart from your traditional DSLRs.

-Manny Pacquiao bought one:
http://philboxing.com/news/story-14642.html

By: jdGONEMAD

jdGONEMAD — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:48:45 +0000

makabili nga ng 2 ganito. hehehehehe .. wish ko lang may pambili talaga.

By: kill3rfill3r

kill3rfill3r — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:43:28 +0000

napakamahal!hehe

By: cornflakes

cornflakes — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:19:54 +0000

pag ako nanalo sa lotto, bibili ako ng 2. =D

By: Jhay

Jhay — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:15:34 +0000

Still, I’d get the new Nikon D3s. If I had the money though.

By: kerov7

kerov7 — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:27:24 +0000

my diamond yata sa loob nito eh. ang lupet! mahal! hehe.

By: pido

pido — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:28:01 +0000

what more kung hasselblad pa camera mo, mas mahal pe yun kesa ito

By: bertsan531

bertsan531 — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:22:15 +0000

@reel advice
ur car cant take pictures and videos this one can hehehe….but this cam is really expensive I also wonder why…

By: sylv3rblade

sylv3rblade — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:54:11 +0000

^
It’s a PRO-level camera… among other things.

By: Reel Advice

Reel Advice — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:16:14 +0000

Kotse na toh! ahaha Can someone explain what made this expensive?

By: aldrin

aldrin — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:09:36 +0000

i thought 75K for a camera is expensive enough… uh oh…

By: bertsan531

bertsan531 — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:43:24 +0000

whoa..250k for a camera hehehehe….

By: Cheftonio

Cheftonio — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:06:18 +0000

huwaw! *drools*

I wonder what the packaged kit lens would be.. (not like it matters for the pros. Im not a pro so im just curious)

By: Darren

Darren — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:14:56 +0000

kool !!!