Comments on: Filipino Photographer sues Manila Bulletin

By: valet parking heathrow

valet parking heathrow — Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:42:45 +0000

Well I am convinced there is more to arrive, this matter can not be satisfied by merely this data in your item Filipino Photographer sues Manila Bulletin . Respectable coverage like this always requires you to go for more articles! Why didnt I think about this? I would genuinely care to understand more on this subject.

By: Filipino

Filipino — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:45:31 +0000

If that also happens to me, maybe I’ll do the same thing.

By: yuga

yuga — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:42:55 +0000

The case is still in court.

By: maricel

maricel — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:33:09 +0000

what happened to case of Anton Sheker Vs. Manila Bulletin now?.
Who wins?

By: SearchingWellness

SearchingWellness — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:30:34 +0000

Naku, I hope the case lands with a judge who understands the web, computer, etc. Otherwise, lawyers will have to educate him. The great technological divide will be a considerable challenge for counsels. Good luck on that!

By: Juler

Juler — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:09:07 +0000

This would be first, but the counter suit by the MD is great also… How will Anton pay them if the case will favor the publishing media?

Goodluck…

By: Jay Quiambao

Jay Quiambao — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:42:41 +0000

It doesn’t take a genius to edit EXIF data. I’m sure there are other ways of comparing photos using algorithms. Check out tineye.com, this site will help you find if your photos are being used elsewhere.

By: Manila Bulletin files counter suit against Photoblogger | YugaTech | Philippines, Technology News & Reviews

Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:32:10 +0000

[...] Anton earlier filed a Php 1.2 Million copyright lawsuit against Manila Bulletin (including the graphics artist and section editor) for publishing his photos without his permission {see earlier story here}. [...]

By: Dave Q

Dave Q — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:39:08 +0000

Hi Yuga!

Looks like this won’t be the last one… tsk tsk

Inquirer steals Inboundpass photo
http://lukewarmnolonger.multiply.com/journal/item/33/photo_theft_–_it_happened_to_me_

By: paul vincent

paul vincent — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:34:07 +0000

I also charge 10k per image that will be used with out my knowledge. Nakalagay yun sa contract ko.

By: paul vincent

paul vincent — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:30:11 +0000

Im a photographer and i always make sure that my images have a copyright embeded in them. How? Sa DSLR camera meron feature na “image authentication” where you will be able to type your name. So everytime you take a picture nakatatak na yun sa image along with what exposures and lenses you used to take the picture. Hindi na mabubura yun. Kahit ilang beses icopy ung picture at manipulate ang image, the original will and must have all the info of the image.

By: karla

karla — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:12:23 +0000

I do hope Anton will win this case. It will make them think that they should have done negotiations with him instead

By: Jan Alvin

Jan Alvin — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:56:06 +0000

Could someone teach how EXIF works??

By: cocoie

cocoie — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:55:07 +0000

Exchangeable Image File Format (EXIF) ah ok.. now i know….tnx y’all

By: Daemon

Daemon — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:34:48 +0000

Electronic evidence as a proof for copyright infringement. Its not new. There are alot of landmark cases where digital signature has been used as evidence, even digital certificates.

Using the EXIF data as a evidence i guess it is so hard to prove. EXIF can be edited and duplicated or reproduced. I can give you the download site.

By: monica isaac

monica isaac — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:01:04 +0000

This is not the only incident. I know another photographer/artist who has been a victim with copyright infringement. It is only that both parties are willing to negotiate within acceptable terms.

I agree that Anton should pursue and fight for his rights to be compensated for publishing his work. It would be interesting to see how this one will turn out if Philippines can really protect artists from copying their creative works.

By: JC John SESE Cuneta

JC John SESE Cuneta — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:27:57 +0000

@Jan
He can and he must. We need this win to change the “Copyright” landscape in this country.

Many companies (and graphic artists at that) do not respect materials published online. I witnessed many companies who do just that. I told not to, but they never listened.

His win against MB will be a win for all of us online publishers. It is a start of a very loooong change. A change that will never happen if nobody will initiate it.

It’s better than nothing. ^^

By: Jan Alvin

Jan Alvin — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:30:21 +0000

Anton was right but Its a big wall his heading to. Can he go against it?

By: Pinoy Blurker » links for 2008-06-11

Pinoy Blurker » links for 2008-06-11 — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:34:34 +0000

[...] Filipino Photographer sues Manila Bulletin | YugaTech | Philippines, Technology News & Reviews [...]

By: PinoyBlurker@PinoyBlogoSphere.com » Blog Archive » links for 2008-06-11

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:33:03 +0000

[...] Filipino Photographer sues Manila Bulletin | YugaTech | Philippines, Technology News & Reviews [...]

By: links for 2008-06-11 « PinoyBlurker @ PinoyBlogoSphere.com

links for 2008-06-11 « PinoyBlurker @ PinoyBlogoSphere.com — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:31:30 +0000

[...] Filipino Photographer sues Manila Bulletin | YugaTech | Philippines, Technology News & Reviews [...]

By: Jeffrey

Jeffrey — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:14:58 +0000

What derailed their settlement? Hhhmmm, Mr Sheker probably asked for 10,000 per photo?

By: JC John SESE Cuneta

JC John SESE Cuneta — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:15:46 +0000

Yep, there are ways to trace the source of things found on the internet, like Photos for example using the EXIF data. There are other ways also other than the EXIF

@PinoyBlogero
Manila Bulletin doesn’t know any better, you know why? Because they think they can use anything found on the Internet.

Remember, before the CC days, blog-explosion days, etc. there was this notion that “everything you put online becomes a public property”? If you’re not familiar with that, then I’m sure that’s what MB or their people thought.

Times changed, Copyright protection are more powerful today than before. A decade ago, people will laughed at you for publishing your stuff online. Today, people will sue you for republishing their materials “published online”.

By: jhay

jhay — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:25:26 +0000

This is really a landmark case, this will definitely set new precedents and standards in new and old media.

By: yuga

yuga — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:37:30 +0000

@cocoie, photos have EXIF data embedded in them. Both parties can show their originals and compare the EXIF data.

By: cocoie

cocoie — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:35:45 +0000

panu niya mapapatunayan na sa kanya galing yung mga photos na yun//?? e khit cno pwedeng kopyahin yan eh tapos iprint..hehe….ewan ko bahala cla….(“,)

By: Ronin

Ronin — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:47:41 +0000

Whatever the outcome will be a great case for future media practitioners to study.

Now we have to wait. We can’t ask on the case’ progress it’s in the court. Sub Judice, as they say. (tama ba? )

This is exciting.

By: KarloPinoyBlogero

KarloPinoyBlogero — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:56:18 +0000

I agree. this case would show people that not everything found on the internet can be taken without permission.

Seriously, Manila Bulletin should know better.

By: Dark Knight

Dark Knight — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:51:12 +0000

I can’t wait to see how this one would go. Yuga is right in addressing this is a landmark case.

By: Philippine Photographer Sues Major Daily for Copyright Infringement. » Blogalicious: a philippine photo odyssey

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:28:58 +0000

[...] Yugatech – http://www.yugatech.com/blog/pinoy-bloggers/filipino-photographer-sues-manila-bulletin/ [...]