<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full feeds vs. Partial feeds: No difference?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yugatech.com/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/</link>
	<description>Philippines, Tech Reviews and Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gebruik van volledige rss feeds heeft geen negatieve impact op click through ratio</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-215763</link>
		<dc:creator>Gebruik van volledige rss feeds heeft geen negatieve impact op click through ratio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1857#comment-215763</guid>
		<description>[...] webloggers. Wat feedburner constateert geld dus voor een behoorlijke grote groep webloggers. Wat deze blogger overigens terecht aanhaalt is dat het artikel zelf misschien nog wel minder interessant is als de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] webloggers. Wat feedburner constateert geld dus voor een behoorlijke grote groep webloggers. Wat deze blogger overigens terecht aanhaalt is dat het artikel zelf misschien nog wel minder interessant is als de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ia</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-138590</link>
		<dc:creator>ia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1857#comment-138590</guid>
		<description>So that&#039;s why your feed formatting has changed! *grin*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that&#8217;s why your feed formatting has changed! *grin*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juantanamera</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-138184</link>
		<dc:creator>juantanamera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1857#comment-138184</guid>
		<description>Honestly, Abe. Your feed looks awful on netvibes, it&#039;s unformatted, links are disabled, and I need to visit your page just to read your posts :(

Was it intentional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, Abe. Your feed looks awful on netvibes, it&#8217;s unformatted, links are disabled, and I need to visit your page just to read your posts <img src='http://www.yugatech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Was it intentional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC John SESE Cuneta</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-138179</link>
		<dc:creator>JC John SESE Cuneta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1857#comment-138179</guid>
		<description>Full feed is the best choice.  Most news syndication sites prefer full feeds as well.

There&#039;s really nothing we can do about spam sites using our posts, instead see it as a way of getting your message across.  People will find the real source no matter what ;)

And, its true, you get more readers than a summary feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full feed is the best choice.  Most news syndication sites prefer full feeds as well.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s really nothing we can do about spam sites using our posts, instead see it as a way of getting your message across.  People will find the real source no matter what <img src='http://www.yugatech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And, its true, you get more readers than a summary feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaypee</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-138053</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaypee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1857#comment-138053</guid>
		<description>Full feeds works best for my blog. I&#039;ve had more readers and less instances of my posts being scraped. 

Also, I believe that most rss readers prefer the full feeds over partial ones coz it&#039;s more convenient. If the like the post, they&#039;d visit the site and check out other comments or leave comments themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full feeds works best for my blog. I&#8217;ve had more readers and less instances of my posts being scraped. </p>
<p>Also, I believe that most rss readers prefer the full feeds over partial ones coz it&#8217;s more convenient. If the like the post, they&#8217;d visit the site and check out other comments or leave comments themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP Loh</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-137958</link>
		<dc:creator>JP Loh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1857#comment-137958</guid>
		<description>By the way, your feed loses the formatting of your entries. Forces me to click on the permalink just to read (even worse than partial entries, IMO). I&#039;m using Google Reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, your feed loses the formatting of your entries. Forces me to click on the permalink just to read (even worse than partial entries, IMO). I&#8217;m using Google Reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-137868</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1857#comment-137868</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using full feeds, and the problem I have is scraping.  I keep seeing pingbacks from sites with my full posts on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using full feeds, and the problem I have is scraping.  I keep seeing pingbacks from sites with my full posts on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhay</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/problogging/full-feeds-vs-partial-feeds-no-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-137844</link>
		<dc:creator>jhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1857#comment-137844</guid>
		<description>Full-view feeds give you a better chance of being read and commented upon when your reader has lots of other feeds to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full-view feeds give you a better chance of being read and commented upon when your reader has lots of other feeds to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

