<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Restoring an earlier Backup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/site-updates/restoring-from-backup-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/site-updates/restoring-from-backup-2/</link>
	<description>Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Игорянча</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/site-updates/restoring-from-backup-2/#comment-243631</link>
		<dc:creator>Игорянча</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1046#comment-243631</guid>
		<description>Любопытно написано, действительно все читал буквально на одном дыхании :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Любопытно написано, действительно все читал буквально на одном дыхании <img src='http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markku</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/site-updates/restoring-from-backup-2/#comment-41429</link>
		<dc:creator>markku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1046#comment-41429</guid>
		<description>Hmm, things like this are scary. The problem with WP 2.0.3 is that it's a resource hog. My guesstimates shows that it eats twice as much resources as WP 1.5.2, unacceptable. WP-Cache on 1.5.2 helps, but I've tried using it with 2.0.3 and it simply doesn't work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, things like this are scary. The problem with WP 2.0.3 is that it&#8217;s a resource hog. My guesstimates shows that it eats twice as much resources as WP 1.5.2, unacceptable. WP-Cache on 1.5.2 helps, but I&#8217;ve tried using it with 2.0.3 and it simply doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuga</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/site-updates/restoring-from-backup-2/#comment-41374</link>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1046#comment-41374</guid>
		<description>I'm already running WP 2.0.3 for quite some time now. After I did a restore, errors were showing up that pointed to wp_cache so I thought it might have been the culprit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m already running WP 2.0.3 for quite some time now. After I did a restore, errors were showing up that pointed to wp_cache so I thought it might have been the culprit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markku</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/site-updates/restoring-from-backup-2/#comment-41351</link>
		<dc:creator>markku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=1046#comment-41351</guid>
		<description>If you're on WP-1.5.2, could it be an SQL injection attack? I don't think WP-Cache makes INSERT/UPDATE calls to the wp_posts table so it shouldn't be the culprit. I might be wrong though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re on WP-1.5.2, could it be an SQL injection attack? I don&#8217;t think WP-Cache makes INSERT/UPDATE calls to the wp_posts table so it shouldn&#8217;t be the culprit. I might be wrong though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
