Comments on: Anybody noticed the inquirer.net transition?

By: PrimeGold

PrimeGold — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:03:42 +0000

Компания которая работает на международном рынке, предлагает
стабильную и перспективную работу с хорошым доходом. Подробная информация находится по адресу
http://www.primegold.org.ua/reg=vasik

By: CarloTech.Net » INQ7 - back to INQ7.net?

CarloTech.Net » INQ7 - back to INQ7.net? — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:23:38 +0000

[...] Yuga posted an article before about the rumor that Inquirer and GMA7 will split off after years of being partners for the new website INQ7. [...]

By: Mike Abundo

Mike Abundo — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:42:39 +0000

Here's what Joey Alarilla said: INQ7.net = Inquirer.net + GMANews.tv GMA's better off getting a YouTube Director account a la CBS.

By: Kiven

Kiven — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:42:00 +0000

my lips are sealed =)

By: vance

vance — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:52:04 +0000

I think inquirer is still partner of gma7 since inquirer.net still have links for Gma7. Maybe they will update the links at the bottom of the new inquirer.net site. hmm…

By: Ederic

Ederic — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:30:02 +0000

Mike Abundo said “TV is dead. GMA 7 is dead weight.”

Hindi rin… :p

Abe, may hiwalayan ba talaga?

By the way, finalist ang GMANews.tv sa Webbys.

By: Mike Abundo

Mike Abundo — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:25:36 +0000

Yes, it is necessary. Back in the dotcom bubble, Big Media thought the key to online success was Even Bigger Media — hence Inq7.

Now more people know what deep Internet surfers have known for years: the key to online success is niche media. Inquirer is in a better position to address niches than GMA.

By: jhay

jhay — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:11:18 +0000

I noticed this since last week. New domains appear once I click to the other sections of the site. Too bad the two companies are parting ways, then again it’s all necessary if one is to survive in the age of ‘new media’.

By: Miguel

Miguel — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:25:57 +0000

Secret!!!

Maybe it’s because Sunstar and most other newspapers use static html with the keywords in the title, while INQ7 uses dynamic URLs with “id.”

In any case I don’t think they care much about those old pages. Philstar and MB don’t care at all and just wipe out old pages!

By: yuga

yuga — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:16:40 +0000

Migs, spill the beans! hehehe

By: elmer

elmer — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:24:07 +0000

Guys it is so obvious that inq7 is moving into real estate or remittance marketplace business and just look at the front page.

@5
What do you mean by very weak on SEO? based on what i know, inq7 gets lots of hits from outside of rp (you should noticed the ads everywhere)

By: Mike Abundo

Mike Abundo — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:52:26 +0000

TV is dead. GMA 7 is dead weight.

By: dennis agulo

dennis agulo — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:51:09 +0000

I also observed that inq7.net is very weak on SEO. It is usually beaten by Sun Star when it comes to old news.

By: Miguel

Miguel — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:48:00 +0000

I know why it’s transitioning… but I can’t tell!

By: JC John SESE Cuneta

JC John SESE Cuneta — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:16:55 +0000

Probably just the sites. GMA have a different approach, Inquirer have a different plan.

By: Carlo

Carlo — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:54:49 +0000

Actually all sub-pages are now resolving to inquirer.net except the ads section.

It’s very recent, I didn’t notice this before, we’ll see what will happen in a couple of days or weeks or months.

By: vance

vance — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:52:45 +0000

i have a question, is the break-up meanig inq will not support GMA 7? or just a separation from the GMA 7 news and the newspaper itself?

I saw some links below for gma 7 and about inq7 and about inquirer.net? the about inq7 relates to the site while the inquirer.net relates to the news paper. hmm maybe they will update this