<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it time to abandon 800&#215;600?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/the-internet/is-it-time-to-abandon-800x600/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/the-internet/is-it-time-to-abandon-800x600/</link>
	<description>Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: luis</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/the-internet/is-it-time-to-abandon-800x600/#comment-21333</link>
		<dc:creator>luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=844#comment-21333</guid>
		<description>The worldwide percentage is actually closer to 20% still using 800x600. 

(http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp)

The mistake that people usually make when trying to decide which minimum-resolution to support is to simply look at their visitor stats and assume that the 800x600 portion is decreasing. That may be true, but there are 6.5 billion people in this world that have yet to go online (and are expected to do so quite soon), and I don't think they will be hopping on with anything more than the minimum 800x600.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worldwide percentage is actually closer to 20% still using 800&#215;600. </p>
<p>(http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp)</p>
<p>The mistake that people usually make when trying to decide which minimum-resolution to support is to simply look at their visitor stats and assume that the 800&#215;600 portion is decreasing. That may be true, but there are 6.5 billion people in this world that have yet to go online (and are expected to do so quite soon), and I don&#8217;t think they will be hopping on with anything more than the minimum 800&#215;600.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Angelo Racoma</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/the-internet/is-it-time-to-abandon-800x600/#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 17:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=844#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Nope. Not everyone uses browsers maximised. I, for one, prefer to have my browser floating just above my other windows (IM, folders, etc.), be it on my 1024x768 laptop screen or 1600x1200 desktop screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope. Not everyone uses browsers maximised. I, for one, prefer to have my browser floating just above my other windows (IM, folders, etc.), be it on my 1024&#215;768 laptop screen or 1600&#215;1200 desktop screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Viloria</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/the-internet/is-it-time-to-abandon-800x600/#comment-21257</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Viloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=844#comment-21257</guid>
		<description>Nope, I won't abandon over 16% of my visitors. 

Besides, even if everyone use 1024 pixel-wide monitors, it would still be easier to read 700 pixel-wide text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, I won&#8217;t abandon over 16% of my visitors. </p>
<p>Besides, even if everyone use 1024 pixel-wide monitors, it would still be easier to read 700 pixel-wide text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/the-internet/is-it-time-to-abandon-800x600/#comment-21256</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 15:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=844#comment-21256</guid>
		<description>I noticed that they were doing some testing of this a few months ago...

http://www.jonpayne.net/?p=114</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that they were doing some testing of this a few months ago&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jonpayne.net/?p=114" rel="nofollow">http://www.jonpayne.net/?p=114</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
