Comments on: Digg banning Diggers for not reading stories?

By: Mike Bohol

Mike Bohol — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:54:45 +0000

I have seen abuses at Digg site. This is one measure that may prevent more abuses.

By: jan2x

jan2x — Sat, 26 May 2007 14:51:13 +0000

Hello,

Have you seen kevin rose’s reply on Digg? I think the reason for it is to prevent abuse, think about it, e.g. 50 diggs in less than 1 min raises an alarm. Don’t you think?

//jan2x

By: Erik

Erik — Fri, 25 May 2007 02:37:32 +0000

Chris is right and I don’t think Digg is being unfair. I guess we all know that the main purpose of Digg’s recent move is to prevent abuse.

By: Jazzy

Jazzy — Thu, 24 May 2007 21:29:31 +0000

Digg should see then how their users actually uses its site.

Then they may introduce a new feature as an actual “bookmark” than “digging”, which presumably represents a vote.

By: Tiffany

Tiffany — Thu, 24 May 2007 16:34:18 +0000

I don’t think that person read the post.

“When you listen to the Diggnation podcast, you would hear either Kevin or Alex referring to Digg as social news and social bookmarking.”

By: Chris

Chris — Thu, 24 May 2007 16:05:53 +0000

“Digg IS a social news and bookmarking site isn’t it?”

Wrong. Digg is NOT a bookmarking site. Never has been.

http://www.digg.com/about

It is clearly laid out right there what Digg is.

By: Tiffany

Tiffany — Thu, 24 May 2007 16:00:31 +0000

Lol. I digg-ed this story.

By: JC John SESE Cuneta

JC John SESE Cuneta — Thu, 24 May 2007 15:24:02 +0000

Hmm yah… heheh the “them” and “them” :p

I will watch my email and see if I receive the same thing :p lolz, I also digg the post of later reading, and I digg really fast… scan the title, its interesting, digg, read later formula.

That’s against their rules? oh my…
Move to BUMPzee then :p or netscape

By: Marie

Marie — Thu, 24 May 2007 10:31:38 +0000

What’s with this post? You talk like a brotha! Heheh.