<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Numbers behind Yahoo!-Nielsen &#8220;Net Index&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/</link>
	<description>Philippines, Technology News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:51:16 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-277396</link>
		<dc:creator>kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-277396</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeena, 

You can get the full database or specific information only from the Net Index study by contacting any of the Nielsen Media associates below:

The Nielsen Company (Philippines), Inc.
Tel: (+632)706-8100 loc. 8160 / 8248 / 8209 / 8244

Or email: kr.quintana@nielsen.com


Cheers! :)
kenneth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeena, </p>
<p>You can get the full database or specific information only from the Net Index study by contacting any of the Nielsen Media associates below:</p>
<p>The Nielsen Company (Philippines), Inc.<br />
Tel: (+632)706-8100 loc. 8160 / 8248 / 8209 / 8244</p>
<p>Or email: <a href="mailto:kr.quintana@nielsen.com">kr.quintana@nielsen.com</a></p>
<p>Cheers! <img src='http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
kenneth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeena</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-267102</link>
		<dc:creator>jeena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-267102</guid>
		<description>Hi Yuga!

Yeah, as far as i know, the sample size of their survey is good enough. I&#039;m interested as to where I could get a copy of their survey. I&#039;m looking in on the internet behavior here. Where do you think could I get a copy for the Nielsen Survey? 

Many thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Yuga!</p>
<p>Yeah, as far as i know, the sample size of their survey is good enough. I&#8217;m interested as to where I could get a copy of their survey. I&#8217;m looking in on the internet behavior here. Where do you think could I get a copy for the Nielsen Survey? </p>
<p>Many thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuga</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-265461</link>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-265461</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Reg.

I have a curious question I thought you might know the answer to. If you were asked to figure out how many people in a city are using the internet, what would be your minimum sample size for say 1 million population like CDO?

Would a sample size of 100 do? Can you do it with less or you&#039;d need more (keep margin of error at +/-5%)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Reg.</p>
<p>I have a curious question I thought you might know the answer to. If you were asked to figure out how many people in a city are using the internet, what would be your minimum sample size for say 1 million population like CDO?</p>
<p>Would a sample size of 100 do? Can you do it with less or you&#8217;d need more (keep margin of error at +/-5%)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regnard</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-265429</link>
		<dc:creator>Regnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-265429</guid>
		<description>Hi Abe!

Re: CDO, we really have to look at the sampling algorithm used by Nielsen for this research. There are different ways on how they got the sample (I&#039;m assuming they had a variation of a randomized sampling method.) If 20++ was the number they got, then that&#039;s the algorithm&#039;s call.

As sample sizes go, I guess the number was adopted because it works in theory (i.e. Central Limit Theorem, and all that statistical stuff). How it actually mirrors the real situation in the Philippines is a different story. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Abe!</p>
<p>Re: CDO, we really have to look at the sampling algorithm used by Nielsen for this research. There are different ways on how they got the sample (I&#8217;m assuming they had a variation of a randomized sampling method.) If 20++ was the number they got, then that&#8217;s the algorithm&#8217;s call.</p>
<p>As sample sizes go, I guess the number was adopted because it works in theory (i.e. Central Limit Theorem, and all that statistical stuff). How it actually mirrors the real situation in the Philippines is a different story. <img src='http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuga</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-265338</link>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-265338</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an earlier figure on Census or something that puts the Urban Population at 48% of the total population of the Philippines.

Given that this research was only done in urban areas, the numbers holds true to only 48% of the country. The other 52% were not included.

My guesstimate is that for the 52% (rural) of the population, the numbers are very much skewed towards the lower end of the bracket.

That means the 28% internet user of the 48% of the population added to the 1% (my number) internet users of the 52% of the population gives us a theoretical ~15% of the total population.

When I saw the numbers reported in the news, the percentage was mistaken as representative of the whole country, not the just urban areas. That basically made the numbers looked promising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an earlier figure on Census or something that puts the Urban Population at 48% of the total population of the Philippines.</p>
<p>Given that this research was only done in urban areas, the numbers holds true to only 48% of the country. The other 52% were not included.</p>
<p>My guesstimate is that for the 52% (rural) of the population, the numbers are very much skewed towards the lower end of the bracket.</p>
<p>That means the 28% internet user of the 48% of the population added to the 1% (my number) internet users of the 52% of the population gives us a theoretical ~15% of the total population.</p>
<p>When I saw the numbers reported in the news, the percentage was mistaken as representative of the whole country, not the just urban areas. That basically made the numbers looked promising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-265333</link>
		<dc:creator>drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-265333</guid>
		<description>Come to think of it the 5% who use the internet everyday isn&#039;t that bad.  In fact, the 28% figure tells us that a lot of us do use the Internet, although not all the time.  You left out some interesting tidbits, such as the 71% who access the Internet in cafes and very low e-commerce activity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to think of it the 5% who use the internet everyday isn&#8217;t that bad.  In fact, the 28% figure tells us that a lot of us do use the Internet, although not all the time.  You left out some interesting tidbits, such as the 71% who access the Internet in cafes and very low e-commerce activity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LX</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-265212</link>
		<dc:creator>LX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-265212</guid>
		<description>IMHO, I believe 1200 is a statistically good sample size.

And a 3% margin of error would mean 4.85% to 5.15%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, I believe 1200 is a statistically good sample size.</p>
<p>And a 3% margin of error would mean 4.85% to 5.15%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-264975</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-264975</guid>
		<description>in Taiwan, some people even have 2 or 3 blogs at the same time. As a matter of fact some parents and grand-parents never use internet no matter where they live!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in Taiwan, some people even have 2 or 3 blogs at the same time. As a matter of fact some parents and grand-parents never use internet no matter where they live!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-264968</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-264968</guid>
		<description>at first glance, 20++ for a city like CDO is not impressive. I have a poor grasp with numbers so I cannot make a derivation on how they arrived at that number. but if it (survey) only has +/- 3% margin of error, indeed that is a good number already. my only concern is how these respondents were chosen. I am going to assume that they did this randomly, it should be OK. 

my problem is, I don’t thin Yahoo! is really the top search engine that we are using. in your experience guys, do you really think it’s Yahoo! in my company, I know of no one at all who still uses Yahoo! for search. as an instant messenger, yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at first glance, 20++ for a city like CDO is not impressive. I have a poor grasp with numbers so I cannot make a derivation on how they arrived at that number. but if it (survey) only has +/- 3% margin of error, indeed that is a good number already. my only concern is how these respondents were chosen. I am going to assume that they did this randomly, it should be OK. </p>
<p>my problem is, I don’t thin Yahoo! is really the top search engine that we are using. in your experience guys, do you really think it’s Yahoo! in my company, I know of no one at all who still uses Yahoo! for search. as an instant messenger, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-264966</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-264966</guid>
		<description>well im from cagayan de oro :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well im from cagayan de oro :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianB</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-264947</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-264947</guid>
		<description>Hot damn! Only a little creepy.

gizmodo.com/5188715/the-penis-train-when-children-playgrounds-go-very-wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot damn! Only a little creepy.</p>
<p>gizmodo.com/5188715/the-penis-train-when-children-playgrounds-go-very-wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winlove</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-264915</link>
		<dc:creator>Winlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-264915</guid>
		<description>Same here. I work in media and have dealt with Nielsen for the longest time. The sample base is sound enough, and having a +/-3% margin of error is a very close confident number for research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here. I work in media and have dealt with Nielsen for the longest time. The sample base is sound enough, and having a +/-3% margin of error is a very close confident number for research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuga</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-264914</link>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-264914</guid>
		<description>@Regnard, so the sample is already an industry standard? How about the 20+ or so sample for a city like CDO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Regnard, so the sample is already an industry standard? How about the 20+ or so sample for a city like CDO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -anton-</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-264912</link>
		<dc:creator>-anton-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-264912</guid>
		<description>I do agree with the opinion [of] Regnard. Just like what our stat teacher told us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree with the opinion [of] Regnard. Just like what our stat teacher told us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -anton-</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-264909</link>
		<dc:creator>-anton-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-264909</guid>
		<description>I do agree with the opinion Regnard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree with the opinion Regnard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regnard</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/blog/yahoo/the-numbers-behind-yahoo-nielsen-net-index/comment-page-1/#comment-264906</link>
		<dc:creator>Regnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/?p=7358#comment-264906</guid>
		<description>Hi Abe!

While more is still better when it comes to statistical significance, 1,200 is already a good number from a market research point of view-- for a population like the urban areas in the Philippines, you&#039;d need around somewhere around 1,100 to have a 95% confidence level for the data results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Abe!</p>
<p>While more is still better when it comes to statistical significance, 1,200 is already a good number from a market research point of view&#8211; for a population like the urban areas in the Philippines, you&#8217;d need around somewhere around 1,100 to have a 95% confidence level for the data results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
