Comments on: Apple drops to 2nd most valuable company

By: Lindsey

Lindsey — Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:03:11 +0000

Hi there Dear, are you truly visiting this web page daily,
if so afterward you will without doubt get good experience.

By: Monger

Monger — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:19:51 +0000

In the real world, you are just a troll who likes to discredit the blogger of a perfectly fine article/post by raising an irrelevant question. Also, google metaphor for your own sake.

By: Monger

Monger — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:06:50 +0000

wow! thanks for rephrasing that for me! it helped a lot. here is your answer: get a life!
by the way, for practicality’s sake, stop thinking for a moment. Why call a phone “galaxy” when it is not a globular cluster?! why not just call it a Samsung Phone?!
Why Apple call their staff “Genius” when they don’t have the IQ of 145 and above?! Why not just call them Apple staff, because that is what they really are?

In fact, why did Steve Jobs named the company Apple when they don’t sell Apple?! Why not just call it Computer?!

If you are in a tech site and you read the word Apple, there is a high probability that they are not talking about the fruit.

By: boy bitok

boy bitok — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:08:06 +0000

“@pons: *This is the problem of id**ts who read articles literally – that’s how you write a sentence, my friend.

So with that kind of argument, figuratively speaking, Apple is a “fruit” company? What figure of speech is that? Please enlighten me…

@Monger you are either did not see my previous post or you just ddd not see my previous post. I’ll rephrase the question, why call Apple a “fruit company” when it obviously does not sell fruits? And just because other tech blogs are saying that it is a fruit company does that mean that they are right? I just dont see the point of calling Apple a “fruit company.” Even if others are using the term doesn’t mean that it’s right, right?

By: Monger

Monger — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:31:03 +0000

I can’t recall raising this matter as a figure of speech. Silly question if I may add.

By: boy bitok

boy bitok — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:10:08 +0000

@Monger so what figure of speech is that bro? You’re point is valid, but you just didn’t answer my question. Now i would say that you were foolish enough to answer that question without reading it through. But i wouldn’t say or even hint to the fact that you’re an “id**t” based on that. Now, if you can answer the question then that would be swell, you’ve by then made a point and I’ve been made the fool. If not, then the both of you should just apologize :D

By: Monger

Monger — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:29:41 +0000

boy bitok, apparently, apple being referred to as “the fruit company” did not start here on yugatech. most tech blogs e.g. engadget, gizmodo, phonearena use the term (check the link below).

those who don’t know that what’s being referred to as “the fruit company” in this article, provided that the word apple is on the title is the idiot. who the fuch needs enlightenment for that other than idiotic fools! it goes without saying

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Apple-earnings-handily-beat-the-Street-again-thanks-to-massive-iPhone-4S-sales_id26234

By: boy bitok

boy bitok — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:57:12 +0000

@pons: *This is the problem of id**ts who read articles literally – that’s how you write a sentence, my friend.

So with that kind of argument, figuratively speaking, Apple is a “fruit” company? What figure of speech is that? Please enlighten me :) If not, then kneel down and apologize! :D

By: richard sebastian

richard sebastian — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:03:03 +0000

a fruit company? that is very misleading.

By: samsung android user

samsung android user — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:23:45 +0000

dapat Bigtime Bob na lang name mo katulad ng palayaw kay Robert Horry mas ok pa yun.