Comments on: Palace asks SC to lift TRO on Anti-Cybercrime Law

By: Jose Farrugia

Jose Farrugia — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:28:37 +0000

If you have read the description on the YouTube video you would clearly understand why I posted it online.

By: Jose Farrugia

Jose Farrugia — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:27:17 +0000

You can find the said video which I was being sued for here – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alsB1vSlLww

By: vladimir

vladimir — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:36:43 +0000

they’re insane, They don’t wanna let the people know some of their bad side, tsk, no more freedom… Suing everywhere, just like what Apple is doing right now

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:21:58 +0000

It’s like how the current (1987) constitution was published and put into effect approximately 6 months.

By: lawrence

lawrence — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:10:31 +0000

Establishing the existence of malice in a libel case is really hard. Dunno, but there is no need for this provialsions bec libel is already covered by the civil code.

By: aedis

aedis — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:59:12 +0000

cite the site? :)

By: yuga

yuga — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:09:39 +0000

This is first-hand info. I personally communicated with both.

By: Arnold Gamboa

Arnold Gamboa — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:18:24 +0000

I’m thinking: why would you upload your verbal altercations online? I mean, seriously! :D

Let’s just forget about the politicians and think about these small, day to day happenings that require a law to back them up when stupid people do stupid stuff against them.

By: alainL

alainL — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:15:51 +0000

Hi. Can you site the source for the last few paragraphs?

By: JMBalicano

JMBalicano — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:05:57 +0000

Kind of funny how eager they are to enable a law that can so easily be exploited. Rather than rushing to get that TRO lifted, they should iron out the kinks in the law that’s getting everyone riled up.