<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>YugaTech &#124; PC Labs &#187; Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/category/benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MSI GT660 Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/msi-gt660-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/msi-gt660-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 02:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi gt660]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi philippines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSI lent us their top gaming laptop, the GT660 so we took some screenshots and basic benchmarks to take a look at how this machine performs. See PassMark results and WEI scores after the jump. MSI GT660 specs: 16″ display screen @ 1366×768 pixels Intel Core i7 720QM @ 1.60GHZ (4 cores, 8 threads) NVidia [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSI lent us their top gaming laptop, the <strong>GT660</strong> so we took some screenshots and basic benchmarks to take a look at how this machine performs. See PassMark results and WEI scores after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-643"></span><br />
<img title="gt660" src="../../blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/msi-gt660-corei7.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<strong>MSI GT660</strong> specs:<br />
16″ display screen @ 1366×768 pixels<br />
Intel Core i7 720QM @ 1.60GHZ (4 cores, 8 threads)<br />
NVidia GeForce GTX 285M 1GB DDR3<br />
6GB DDR3 RAM (3 x 2GB Dual Channel)<br />
2 x 500GB Seagate SATA (1TB total)</p>
<p><img title="gt660" src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/cpu-gt660.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><img title="gt660" src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/gpu-gt660.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the screenshot from Speccy:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/speccy-gt660.png"><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/speccy-gt660-150x150.png" alt="" /><br />
</a><br />
<strong>PassMark Results</strong>:<br />
CPU Compression: 3920.8 KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 14.5 MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 624.5 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 1306.9 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 1539.4 million operations per second<br />
Graphics 3D Simple: 1184.4 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Medium: 440.4 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Complex: 50.5 fps (32-bit)</p>
<p>CPU Mark: <strong>3539.4</strong><br />
2D Graphics Mark: <strong>222.8</strong><br />
3D Graphics Mark: <strong>904.5</strong><br />
Memory Mark: <strong>1098.2</strong><br />
Disk Mark: <strong>531.0</strong><br />
Passmark Rating: <strong>1151.9</strong></p>
<p>Windows Experience Index scores:<br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/wei-gt660.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Here’s a reference for Windows Experience Index of the CPU compared to others in the netbook/ultraportable category but we&#8217;re collecting more data from other laptop CPUs to be included soon:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/netbook-cpu-thumb.gif" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/msi-gt660-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aspire One 721 vs. 751 vs. Timeline 1810tz</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/aspire-one-721-vs-751-vs-timeline-1810tz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/aspire-one-721-vs-751-vs-timeline-1810tz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acer aspire one 721]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acer aspire one 751]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acer timeline 1810tz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got three notebooks from Acer in the 11.6-inch category and compared them against each other using Windows Experience Index. Acer Aspire One 721 AMD Athlon II Neo K125 @ 1.7GHz w/ ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 Acer Timeline 1810tz Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 @ 1.3GHz w/ Intel GMA 4500MHD Acer Aspire One 751 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got three notebooks from Acer in the 11.6-inch category and compared them against each other using Windows Experience Index.</p>
<p><span id="more-656"></span><strong>Acer Aspire One 721</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/wei-ao7211.png"  /><br />
AMD Athlon II Neo K125 @ 1.7GHz w/ ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225</p>
<p><strong>Acer Timeline 1810tz</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/1810tz.png" /><br />
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 @ 1.3GHz w/ Intel GMA 4500MHD</p>
<p><strong>Acer Aspire One 751</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/windows-index.gif"  /><br />
Intel Atom Z520 @ 1.3GHz w/ Intel GMA 500</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/aspire-one-721-vs-751-vs-timeline-1810tz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Atom N280 vs. Atom N450 Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/intel-atom-n280-vs-atom-n450-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/intel-atom-n280-vs-atom-n450-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n280]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n450]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[n280 vs n450]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Intel upgraded their Atom CPUs from N270 and N280 to the latest Atom N450 where they integrated the graphics chip into the CPU, we wondered if the new N450 performs better than N280. We check both with some benchmarks. Intel Atom N280 vs. Atom N450 Benchmark Intel Atom N280 PassMark Results: CPU Compression: 1541.3KB/s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Intel upgraded their Atom CPUs from N270 and N280 to the latest Atom N450 where they integrated the graphics chip into the CPU, we wondered if the new N450 performs better than N280. We check both with some benchmarks.</p>
<p><span id="more-696"></span><br />
<strong>Intel Atom N280</strong> vs. <strong>Atom N450</strong> Benchmark<br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cpuz-n280.gif" alt="" /><br />
<strong>Intel Atom N280 PassMark Results</strong>:<br />
CPU Compression: 1541.3KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 6.4MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 98.3 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 22.5 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 98.4 million operations per second<br />
CPU Mark: <strong>243.5</strong></p>
<p>Windows Experience Index: CPU Sub-Score <strong>2.3</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/s103t-cpuz.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Intel Atom N450 PassMark Results</strong>:<br />
CPU Compression: 1511.7 KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 6.3 MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 93.2 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 22.2 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 92.8 million operations per second<br />
CPU Mark: 232.7</p>
<p>Windows Experience Index: CPU Sub-Score <strong>2.3</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/intel-atom-n280-vs-atom-n450-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Vaio Y Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/sony-vaio-y-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/sony-vaio-y-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony vaio y]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We gathered some pretty basic benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this entry, we looked at the Sony Vaio Y. Sony Vaio Y specs: 13.3″ display screen @ 1366×768 pixels Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 @ 1.3GHz Intel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We gathered some pretty basic benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this entry, we looked at the <strong>Sony Vaio Y</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-573"></span><img src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_2svYuTMC22k/S6wKxIp_zEI/AAAAAAAACMk/FU8UVfoTXuU/vaio-y-culv.JPG" alt="Vaio Y" /></p>
<p><strong>Sony Vaio Y</strong> specs:<br />
13.3″ display screen @ 1366×768 pixels<br />
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 @ 1.3GHz<br />
Intel GMA 4500MHD<br />
2GB DDR3 RAM<br />
320GB HDD</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cpuz-vaioy.gif" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/gpuz-vaioy.gif" /></p>
<p><strong>PassMark Results</strong>:<br />
CPU Compression: 2773.4 KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 16.5 MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 444.2 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 113.5 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 414.6 million operations per second<br />
Graphics 3D Simple: 406.7 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Medium: 53.6 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Complex: 17.2 fps (32-bit)</p>
<p>CPU Mark: 773.5<br />
2D Graphics Mark: 131.2<br />
3D Graphics Mark: 152.8<br />
Memory Mark: 228<br />
Disk Mark: 429.7<br />
Passmark Rating: 372.5</p>
<p><strong>Windows Experience Index</strong>:<br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/wei-vaioy.gif" /></p>
<p>Here’s a reference for Windows Experience Index of the CPU compared to others in the netbook/ultraportable category:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/netbook-cpu-thumb.gif" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/sony-vaio-y-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSI Wind U135 Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/msi-wind-u135-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/msi-wind-u135-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the MSI Wind U135. MSI Wind U135 specs: 10.1″ display screen @ 1024×600 pixels Intel Atom N450 @ 1.66GHz Intel GMA 3150 1GB DDR2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the <strong>MSI Wind U135</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-564"></span><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/msiwind-u135.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>MSI Wind U135</strong> specs:<br />
10.1″ display screen @ 1024×600 pixels<br />
Intel Atom N450 @ 1.66GHz<br />
Intel GMA 3150<br />
1GB DDR2 RAM<br />
250GB HDD</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/gpuz-u135.gif"  /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/cpuz-u135.gif"   /></p>
<p><strong>PassMark Results</strong>:<br />
CPU Compression: 1542.7KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 6.5MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 98.1 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 23 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 99.6 million operations per second<br />
Graphics 3D Simple: 135 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Medium: 13.4 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Complex: 1.66 fps (32-bit)</p>
<p>CPU Mark: 238<br />
2D Graphics Mark: 51.6<br />
3D Graphics Mark: 48.1<br />
Memory Mark: 155.6<br />
Disk Mark: 462.2<br />
Passmark Rating: 197.7</p>
<p>Windows Experience Index:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/wei-msiu135.gif"  /></p>
<p>Here’s a reference for Windows Experience Index of the CPU compared to others in the netbook/ultraportable category:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/netbook-cpu-thumb.gif"  /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/msi-wind-u135-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/lenovo-ideapad-s10-3t-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/lenovo-ideapad-s10-3t-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo philippines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t. Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t specs: 10.1″ display screen @ 1024×600 pixels Intel Atom N450 @ 1.66GHz Intel GMA 3150 1GB DDR2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the <strong>Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-553"></span><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/s10-3t.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t</strong> specs:<br />
10.1″ display screen @ 1024×600 pixels<br />
Intel Atom N450 @ 1.66GHz<br />
Intel GMA 3150<br />
1GB DDR2 RAM<br />
250GB HDD</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/s103t-cpuz.png" alt="" title="s103t-cpuz"  /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/s103t-gpuz.png" alt="" title="s103t-gpuz"  /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/s103t-video.png" alt="" title="s103t-video" /></p>
<p><strong>PassMark Results</strong>:<br />
CPU Compression: 1511.7 KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 6.3 MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 93.2 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 22.2 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 92.8 million operations per second<br />
Graphics 3D Simple: 171.4 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Medium: 18.1 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Complex: 2.26 fps (32-bit)</p>
<p>CPU Mark: 232.7<br />
2D Graphics Mark: 71.7<br />
3D Graphics Mark: 61.4<br />
Memory Mark: 208.9<br />
Disk Mark: 408.1<br />
Passmark Rating: 199.5</p>
<p>Windows Experience Index:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/wei-s10-3t.gif"  /></p>
<p>Here’s a reference for Windows Experience Index of the CPU compared to others in the netbook/ultraportable category:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/netbook-cpu-thumb.gif"  /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/lenovo-ideapad-s10-3t-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redfox WizBook Razor XR133 Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/redfox-wizbook-razor-xr133-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/redfox-wizbook-razor-xr133-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redfox philippines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the Redfox WizBook Razor XR133. Redfox WizBook Razor XR133 specs: 13.3″ display screen @ 1280×800 pixels Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 1.3GHz Intel GMA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the <strong>Redfox WizBook Razor XR133</strong>.<br />
<span id="more-539"></span> <img src="http://www.yugatech.com/gallery/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/redfox-razor08.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong>Redfox WizBook Razor XR133</strong> specs:<br />
13.3″ display screen @ 1280×800 pixels<br />
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 1.3GHz<br />
Intel GMA 4500MHD<br />
2GB DDR2 RAM<br />
320GB HDD</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/redfox-cpuz.png" /><br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/gpuz-redfox.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>PassMark Results</strong>:<br />
CPU Compression: 1806.9KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 10.6MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 286.3 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 72.6 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 276.5 million operations per second<br />
Graphics 3D Simple: 364.4 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Medium: 51.9 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Complex: 11.8 fps (32-bit)</p>
<p>CPU Mark: 375.3<br />
2D Graphics Mark: 75.7<br />
3D Graphics Mark: 137.0<br />
Memory Mark: 198.3<br />
Disk Mark: 653.4<br />
Passmark Rating: 294.7</p>
<p><strong>Windows Experience Index</strong>:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/wei-redfox.png" /></p>
<p>Here’s a reference for Windows Experience Index of the CPU compared to others in the netbook/ultraportable category:<br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/netbook-cpu-thumb.gif" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/redfox-wizbook-razor-xr133-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus UL20A Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/asus-ul20a-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/asus-ul20a-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus ul20]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the Asus UL20A. Asus UL20 specs: 12.1″ display @ 1366×768 pixels Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 1.3GHz Intel GMA 4500MHD 4GB DDR2 RAM 320GB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the <strong>Asus UL20A</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-532"></span><br />
Asus UL20 specs:<br />
12.1″ display @ 1366×768 pixels<br />
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 1.3GHz<br />
Intel GMA 4500MHD<br />
4GB DDR2 RAM<br />
320GB HDD</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/asus-ul20-cpuz.gif" alt="" title="asus ul20" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/asus-ul20-gpuz.gif" alt="" title="asus ul20" /></p>
<p><strong>PassMark Results</strong>:<br />
CPU Compression: 3050.4KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 18MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 468.5 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 123.4 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 476 million operations per second<br />
Graphics 3D Simple: 419.3 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Medium: 78.6 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Complex: 21.1 fps (32-bit)</p>
<p>CPU Mark: 835.6<br />
2D Graphics Mark: 147.3<br />
3D Graphics Mark: 166.1<br />
Memory Mark: 344<br />
Disk Mark: 242.7<br />
Passmark Rating: 376.6</p>
<p><strong>Windows Experience Index</strong>:<br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/wei-asus-ul20.gif" alt="" title="" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-533" /></p>
<p>Here’s a reference for Windows Experience Index of the CPU compared to others in the netbook/ultraportable category:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/netbook-cpu-thumb.gif"  /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/asus-ul20a-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Eee PC 1201T Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/asus-eee-pc-1201t-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/asus-eee-pc-1201t-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus 1201t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus eeepc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the Asus Eee PC 1201T. Asus Eee PC 1201T specs: 12.1&#8243; display @ 1366&#215;768 pixels AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 1.6GHz ATI Radeon HD3200 2GB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the <strong>Asus Eee PC 1201T</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-521"></span><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/1201t-asus.jpg"  /></p>
<p><strong>Asus Eee PC 1201T</strong> specs:<br />
12.1&#8243; display @ 1366&#215;768 pixels<br />
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 1.6GHz<br />
ATI Radeon HD3200<br />
2GB DDR2 RAM<br />
320GB HDD</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/cpuz-1201t.gif" alt="" title="cpuz-1201t" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/gpuz-1201t.gif" alt="" title="gpuz-1201t" /></p>
<p><strong>PassMark Results</strong>:</p>
<p>CPU Compression: 1208.8KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 9.2MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 108.0 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 40.5 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 135.3 million operations per second<br />
Graphics 3D Simple: 138.7 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Medium: 31.4 fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Complex: 12.4 fps (32-bit)</p>
<p>CPU Mark: 232.8<br />
2D Graphics Mark: 135.6<br />
3D Graphics Mark: 58.4<br />
Memory Mark: 253.2<br />
Disk Mark: 418.6<br />
Passmark Rating: 218.1</p>
<p><strong>Windows Experience Index</strong>:<br />
<img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/1201t-wei.png" /></p>
<p>Here’s a reference for Windows Experience Index of the CPU compared to others in the netbook/ultraportable category:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/netbook-cpu-thumb.gif"  /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/asus-eee-pc-1201t-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lenovo ThinkPad X100e Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yuga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo thinkpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thinkpad x100e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the Lenovo ThinkPad X100e. Lenovo ThinkPad X100e specs: 11.6″ dispay screen @ 1366×768 pixels AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 @ 1.6GHz ATI Radeon HD3200 2GB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We gathered simple benchmarks of laptops and desktop PCs to get their relative performance with each other. We used PassMark Performance Test for this purpose. In this round, we looked at the <strong>Lenovo ThinkPad X100e</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-518"></span><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/lenovothinkpad-x100e.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong>Lenovo ThinkPad X100e</strong> specs:<br />
11.6″ dispay screen @ 1366×768 pixels<br />
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 @ 1.6GHz<br />
ATI Radeon HD3200<br />
2GB DDR2 RAM<br />
250GB HDD</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/cpuz-lenovo.png" /></p>
<p><strong>PassMark Results</strong>:</p>
<p>CPU Compression: 1296.6KB/s<br />
CPU Encryption: 9.5MB/s<br />
Find Prime Number: 114.7 operations per second<br />
CPU Integer Math: 32.5 million operations per second<br />
CPU Floating Point: 133.5 million operations per second<br />
Graphics 3D Simple: 50.7fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Medium: 13.2fps (32-bit)<br />
Graphics 3D Complex: 15.0fps (32-bit)</p>
<p>CPU Mark: 232.2<br />
2D Graphics Mark: 102.1<br />
3D Graphics Mark: 25.3<br />
Memory Mark: 186.5<br />
Disk Mark: 477.6<br />
Passmark Rating: 219.1</p>
<p><strong>Windows Experience Index</strong>:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/thinkpad-x100e-wei.jpg"  /></p>
<p>Here’s a reference for Windows Experience Index of the CPU compared to others in the netbook/ultraportable category:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/netbook-cpu-thumb.gif" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/lenovo-thinkpad-x100e-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	<div class="pageList" id="pageList"></div><div class="pageList_pages">3 pages</div><script type="text/javascript">pageList = new pageList("pageList",3,10,1,"http://www.yugatech.com/pclabs/category/benchmarks/feed/page/");</script></channel>
</rss>

