I wanted to write about this a long time ago but kept it off until today when I read several comments about the Phil. Blog Awards. Yes, blogging is a privilege. It is not for everybody. It is only for those who have internet access. It is only for those who have enough time on their hands. It is only for those who have something to write or say.
So, don’t be surprised to learn that the demographics of bloggers are the ones who can pay for DSL on their homes and offices or even that Visibility or PLDT WeRoam. Don’t be surprised that these bloggers are the ones who have enough time to write and bloghop instead of worrying about their 8-5 jobs (worse, look for a job) or studying for their final exams and do their homework.
If you join our online community at MotorcyclePhilippines.com and you happen to go to one of the EBs (eyeballs), you will realize that 99% of them have motorcycles. And yes, that does not represent the Philippine demographics (i.e. not 99% of the country have their own motorbikes). I co-own that site of close to 40,000 members and I don’t even have my own bike.
If you join a Photography club and 80% of the people who come to photo shoots have dSLRs, it doesn’t mean the 20% who have point-and-shoot cameras is the minority group in the entire country. In fact it’s the other way around — there are more point-and-shoot camera than dSLR owners in the Philippines.
So, if you go to events that require you to wear formal attires, don’t expect that people attending it is representative of any bigger sample population. The ones you might be expecting are still in school finishing their exams, or still at the office doing OTY (thank you overtime). The ones you will meet are the people who have enough time on their hands, the ones who have gas money, or the ones who can pay for a taxi cab. Go to our blog parteeh and you’ll see that the demographics of the people there are totally different from that of the blog awards.
More than half of the population in the Philippines are poor. My parents are poor. My brother didn’t finish college nor does he have a job to feed his 3 kids. That doesn’t mean I need to find a way for them to blog and be part of this online community. I can’t, because they have something more important to spend time on other than writing about their thoughts. I wish I could, but I have to fulfill my other responsibilities to them first.
Blogging is a privilege, it’s not a right. Do not equate it with your constitutional right to suffrage or to get a decent education (hell, not even everyone has had education). So don’t expect that the blogging population is in any way representative of the voting population.
It’s nice to blog, but the “privilege” you talk about is exploited by other so-called bloggers.They pretend to be members of the press, barging in at press events, just to partake of free food. I have no respect for scums like that. Also, there is a reason why Journalism is offered as a formal academic course in college. There is a Reason why Editors exist to fact check and ensure the integrity of a journalist’s work. Bloggers? Who does that for you?? Partake of free food, if you want, but NOT in the company of Legitimate members of the press who have worked their backsides off to gain Years of respectable experience and reputation. There is a reason why bloggers will Never be recognized as legitimate members of the press. For the absence of an editor, alone, I strongly support that reason.
I as well as my guys were actually going through the nice items from your website then all of the sudden got a terrible feeling I had not thanked the website owner for those techniques. All of the boys appeared to be as a consequence stimulated to see all of them and now have simply been having fun with them. We appreciate you really being well thoughtful and then for deciding on this kind of beneficial subjects millions of individuals are really desperate to be aware of. My personal honest regret for not expressing appreciation to you sooner.
I am not going to tell fibs, you have lost me here – Philippines, Technology News & Reviews. I know that you intended well and you manifestly know what you are publishing about, but I cant pronounce that I get where you are coming from. There is no smoke without fire and on that point there are no comments without articles.
Nice article with several fascinating ideas! Can’t say I completely agree with everything you have said here, but there are many critical recommendations you have highlighted that can be rather useful on natural health and related topics. Keep offering more recommendations on this topic and associated topics, as there are quite a few folks who are working to get to know the ups and downs.
I bookmarked this site a while ago because of the new content and I have never been unsatisfied. Continue the outstanding work.
This post sounds a bit harsh and I feel like I can’t completely agree with it. I think blogging is a privilege but should be made available to everyone.
I’d like to know what Manong Manbabalot would blog. I think he should be given the privilege to blog as well. Is it starting to sound as a right?
Right now, I feel like there’s a long tail in our blogosphere (if there even is one).
(I can’t resist throwing in my 2 cents, so here it goes…)
The word “privilege”, legally speaking and as used by most people, implies something that is granted by authority.
Rights are more fundamental and speak to our innate sense of what is good, proper, just, or “natural”.
Granted, there is an apparent confusion with these terms (“privileges” are sometimes equated with “rights”). But when both concepts are used within the same discussion, what differentiates them, I believe, is that there is an “authority” that bestows privileges; privileges too, are not conferred to all.
To wit: All people have the right to blog. It’s just that the “privileged” are the ones able to do it (this situation, however, does not change the nature of blogging being a right).
I’ve caught up with the entries and comments about this post, from all over, and I bristle at the thought that people include economics as a factor in determining rights.
That is a failure to see the overtly fundamental meaning of existence: to freely do so.
Yuga clarifies his point, almost tantalizingly on the fence. The champagne analogy, well sure, everyone has the right to drink champagne. But not everyone can. Everyone has the right to own a fancy car, but not everyone can.
Blogging is speech. It is a right, and is even more free than most other forms of speech.
Like blogie, I’ve said my fill.
Yes, I agree. But I am under the impression that this is an intelligent discussion (a heated debate at some point). :)