Sen. Jinggoy Ejercito Estrada has recently filed Senate Bill No. 2871 which requires all child passengers of motor vehicles to be appropriately restrained in order to reduce incidence of injuries and fatalities resulting from motor vehicle crashes.
According to the bill, child passengers who are ages six years and below are required to be in child restraints like booster seats and other products with a lap and shoulder belt assembly, that meets applicable motor vehicle safety standards prescribed by the Land Transportation Office (LTO).
Image by Audi
The mandate will apply to private and public vehicles and are given one year from the issuance of the IRR by the LTO to install the appropriate child restraints. Drivers of public vehicles are also required to inform and require the adult accompanying the child upon boarding a vehicle to restrain the child passenger.
Those who fail to restrain a child passenger will receive a minimum fine of Php100USD 2INR 144EUR 2CNY 12 but not to exceed Php1,000USD 17INR 1,445EUR 16CNY 124 for the first violation; Php200USD 3INR 289EUR 3CNY 25 to Php2,000USD 34INR 2,889EUR 32CNY 248 for the second violation; and Php500USD 9INR 722EUR 8CNY 62 to Php5,000USD 85INR 7,223EUR 81CNY 621 fine with suspension of driver’s license for 1 week for the third and succeeding violations.
“The safety of children is a primary consideration during road travel. Regardless of the type of vehicle and the distance of the trip, every child should always be kept and positioned safely inside the vehicles by using safety devices or installations.” said Senator Jinggoy Estrada in the bill’s explanatory note.
source: Senate.gov.ph
via: AutoIndustriya
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
andre says:
yesss….dagdag pagkakakitaan na naman, tsk
harlan g says:
A solution in search of a problem?
1. Where is the data on child (<=6 yrs old) fatalities/injuries from VAs?
2. What is the target reduction rate (10%?, 50%?, 90%?) of this law?
Given no data, how are we supposed to know whether:
1. This is a private problem rather than a public issue?
2. What the target reductions are?
3. Whether this particular law, as opposed to some other unexplored measures, will even help achieve such targets? Assuming #1, course?
On the other hand, consider:
1. Who will profit: retailers of child restraint systems, corrupt LTO enforcers, senators who wish to lengthen their resumes, etc…
2. Who will lose: vehicle owners.
Absent data, FUD/superstition rules.
Billy Ho says:
So how does this apply to the masses who do not have vehicles and rely on public transportation? They need to be carrying a child seat around with them when getting on LTR, Bus, Jeepney, Trike? Note many of the public vehicles are not compatible with child restraints… what then? Children are not aloud to occupy them?
I understand the need to protect our children but it is hard to do so when the public transportation (Jeeps/Trikes) is primarily not even able to deal with such safety issues. You need to completely revamp all public transportation if this is going down. Why is my 4 year old child less safe in a public taxi and require me to put him in a seat then he would be on a Jeep, trike, bus… which is by far the large majority of public transportation?
Elcee says:
Good job.. another stupid law..
imagi says:
ngek. not all vehicles are equipped with a seatbelt that would allow installation/proper placement of a child seat. this is a stupid law that was not studied properly. so this law effectively prohibits children (6 years and below) from riding a motorcycle.
c says:
Paanong nakapag file ng bill iyan sa kulungan? :D
Alex says:
Ag tanong pano to papatupad. Ang daming batas sa pinas na hagang sulat na lang
mark says:
halow po.. bago kayo mag comment jan di nyo ba alam na matagal na itong pinatupad na law sa ibang bansa? at sinung nagsabing stupid ang law na ito?
Sa australia bawal kang magpatakbo nang sasakyan na may sakay nabata pag wala kang baby seat no 1 rule yan
Ang problema is kaya ba nang karamihang may ari nang sasakyan na bumili nang baby seat? na ang pinaka mura is nasa $300?
daming nag cocoment akala mo alam na nila laht..