Samsung had a really good year this year. It started with the new Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge that introduced further refinements to the already well-received Galaxy S6, S6 Edge and S6 Edge+. Sales figures were off the charts and Samsung seems to be on a winning streak for the last 2 consecutive years.
The introduction of the Galaxy Note7 was also well-received. It was supposed to be an affirmation that Samsung remains to be the “King of Android” that can easily slug it out with the iPhone and Apple’s massive cult-like following.
Then the unimagined happened. Barely weeks after the release of the Galaxy Note7, reports of devices exploding (more like bursting into flames) were already circulating in the media.
A couple of reports might just be isolated cases. Every now and then, we’ve seen reports of iPhones also bursting to flames too. But this one was different. More reports came in and in less than a month, over 70 reported cases of Note7 exploding is hard to deny.
Airlines started banning the use of Note7 handsets in flights and more advisories were released. Eventually, Samsung admitted that there was some manufacturing defect in some of the batteries that were shipped with the Note7.
A battery defect is normal as it’s the most volatile part of a device. In another scenario, this could just have been a battery replacement program. The last time I remember something similar to this would be the “Bumper Case Program” for the iPhone 4.
That would have been a minor hold-up but since the battery on the Note7 is non-removable, the entire phone had to be replaced.
The “antenna-gate” and the “bend-gate” that hounded Apple a couple years back pales in comparison to what Samsung had to endure with the Galaxy Note7, much less the financial setback this type of recall is costing them. Reports estimate the recall would amount to about $1PHP 59INR 85EUR 0.95CNY 7 billion for the 2.5 million devices shipped since the initial release.
It’s a hassle for many to have to return their units and wait for further instructions on when to get their replacement. Good thing Samsung also offered an option to either swap for a Galaxy S7 Edge plus change or completely get a refund. Samsung handled this one fairly well.
If you got your Note7 from a carrier, the experience could range from easy as walking into a business center and leaving with a new one or as complicated as getting the run around, depending on who you’re talking to.
Worse if you got your unit from grey market sellers. Since they don’t normally offer full warranty for situations like this, you might be getting the shorter end of the stick or nothing at all.
There’s a little bit of lesson for all of us here:
1) The potential problem of non-removable batteries. Batteries are the most volatile part of the phone. By making them non-removable, it poses a bigger risk to users as reflected in recent incidents. Should we move back to removable batteries, then?
2) The handling of the crisis by the brand. Despite the very low incidence of exploding Note7, Samsung decided to do a recall of all 2.5 million devices. Safety before profit.
3) the potential risks of getting a more affordable device from grey market sellers. This is a classic case that separates “service warranty” vs. “manufacturer’s warranty”. You pay less for “service warranty” but you don’t get the same peace of mind if ever the device is defective.
Despite the setback, I think Samsung will eventually get thru this and the Note7 will continue to be a best-seller.
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
Ren says:
I appreciate TMobile and others who offered refund, thus giving their customers the freedom and peace of mind. Replacement? Feels like they are holding their customers in the neck. Good article though. Good lesson for buyers to be more keen in choosing the right sellers.
zip says:
Kaya ako bumibili ng cp mga 5 months ng nakalipas para may review at comment ang mga users. Pag sinuwerte pa ay mas mababa pa presyo.
Josh says:
I am not a keen observer. Where are the 3 lessons?
Josh says:
Thank you Yuga Master.
Mat says:
I’m unfamiliar with the rules regarding grey units, but I think the fact that a unit is “grey” seems irrelevant since this is a worldwide recall and Samsung is set to replace all units.
Boy Abe-unda says:
Dagdag ko lang: 4) Manufacturers should never rush the production of units whatever their reason is. Never compromise the quality of a product.
Rookie mistake ‘yung ginawa ng Samsung Mobile. Kahit na may profit pa rin sila dahil sa success ng S7/S7 Edge at iba pa nilang units, natakot na ‘yung ibang users na magbalik-loob sa Samsung.