YouTube’s head of monetization, Shashi Seth, has now left Google to join a new start-up named Cooliris. He’s been working on YouTube as early as February 2007 but since then, there’s not much success with making money off the video sharing site.
Google bought YouTube for about $1.6PHP 94INR 136EUR 2CNY 12 Billion in 2006. The growth of the video sharing service has grown exponentially to become one of the top website destinations worldwide. Never mind the cost of operation such a bandwidth-hungry service as Google hoped it could get its money back thru advertising.
Revver, another competing site, makes money by overlaying ads over the video. YouTube followed this strategy in 2007. Turns out, Revver wasn’t making enough money from the ads. It went down in debt and was sold for less than a million dollars earlier this year.
According to GigaOm sources, YouTube only made a measly $80PHP 4,695INR 6,780EUR 76CNY 582 million in 2007. That’s just gross revenues and one can only imagine how much operating expenses they’ve incurred hosting all the videos. This number was expected to grow to $125PHP 7,336INR 10,594EUR 119CNY 910 million this year though other estimates put it just around $90PHP 5,282INR 7,627EUR 86CNY 655 M.
They say that the slow growth was due to that hulking $1PHP 59INR 85EUR 0.95CNY 7 Billion lawsuit by Viacom a year ago. My guess is totally different. When was the last time a lawsuit ever stopped Google from making money?
My bet is on the fact that the monetization strategy YouTube implements on the videos are way off. Contextual overlay ads? And viewers need to click in order for premium publishers to earn from it? It’s common knowledge that TV viewers hate advertisements. That’s why cable came into business and TiVo is making tons of profits. Why would the same be any different online? When was the last time you clicked on a video overlay ad on YouTube?
I think Google should re-think its monetization strategy with YouTube. How about injecting a video ad before the video loads, similar to what Revver used to do? Wait, the Revver is doing the overlay Google ads now right? Uh-oh.
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
jhay says:
Perhaps it would turn to paid or premium services? I can only imagine how much YouTube takes away from Google’s coffers just to keep it running.
Then again, what would happen if YouTube would suffer the same fate as Revver did? OMG
Jeffrey says:
Putting an ad before every video would be good, but it may disappoint viewers. Probably make it 10 seconds or less in length.
Or put a clickable watermark ad on the screen.
Jim says:
I think even photo sharing site hardly earn some money (though I might be wrong with flickr). Ringo is closing down at the end of the month. The only reason that it cited, though not directly, was the withdrawal of its partner in hosting video for its site, which it introduced just late last year. After all the effort in re-designing its site and ‘requesting’ members to click sponsors’ site, it apparently is not earning that much.
Alexis says:
Hi,
Video sharing is all the rage those days. We all want to share our videos, to share our passions and the things we like. There are so many sites around to publish our videos on the web that it is sometimes hard to make a choice. We know some of them like YouTube, Revver or Dailymotion, but there are so many others competing to be the number one, or targeting a specific audience, whether geographically (China, Japan, Turkey…), by language (German, Arabic, French…) or for the kind of content they enable to publish (cooking, planes, extreme sports…).
I have compiled a growing list of nearly 700 video sharing sites, video search engines, and video download sites that you can check at http://www.ilikesharingvideos.com
For each of them, you will get useful information such as their history, the country from which most of their visitors come, their niche, their rank, their latest news…
This site offers some other interesting features, like a forum about online videos, how to make money with your videos, how to create your own YouTube site, etc.
So if you are interested in video sharing or online video marketing, give an eye to this site, it worths it.
Cheers
Doucheblog.co.cc says:
How about injecting a video ad before the video loads, similar to what Revver used to do?
-Hell no. That would be so annoying1