We recently reviewed both the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G and the vivo V50 5G, two mid-range phones that sit in the under PHP 27K bracket of the segment. They each bring their own strengths to the table; whether it’s Samsung’s trusted OneUI experience or vivo’s Zeiss-tuned cameras. (which is pretty wild!) Comparing battery benchmarks, in our PCMark Work 3.0 tests; The Galaxy A56 lasted 15 hours and 15 minutes, while the vivo V50 scored 21 hours and 3 minutes. So when it comes to Battery, it seems pretty clear that the vivo V50 takes this one too, for its better battery life and faster charging. We recommend the vivo V50 5G for those who want a handset with thinner display bezels compared to something like the A56, a higher IP rating, decent cameras, and better battery life and charging. And that wraps up this comparison review, which team are you guys on for this match-up: Samsung or vivo? Read more in our articles including "Samsung Galaxy A56 5G vs vivo V50 5G - Which one’s better?" and "Samsung study finds Galaxy Watch6 can detect early signs of fainting".
We recently reviewed both the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G and the vivo V50 5G, two…
May 13, 2025
Samsung announced that a joint study with Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital in Korea found that…
May 7, 2026
Smartphones today can handle all the basics. The real difference now is how well a…
Apr 30, 2026
Samsung has introduced a special edition of the Galaxy S26 Ultra in the Philippines, offering…
Apr 27, 2026
Every year, a “Fan Edition” (FE) of that year’s flagship launches a few months after…
Apr 4, 2026
The Samsung A-series line has competed fiercely in the entry-level to midrange PH smartphone market,…
Apr 3, 2026We recently reviewed both the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G and the vivo V50 5G, two mid-range phones that sit in the under PHP 27K bracket of the segment. They each bring their own strengths to the table; whether it’s Samsung’s trusted OneUI experience or vivo’s Zeiss-tuned cameras. (which is pretty wild!) Comparing battery benchmarks, in our PCMark Work 3.0 tests; The Galaxy A56 lasted 15 hours and 15 minutes, while the vivo V50 scored 21 hours and 3 minutes.
So when it comes to Battery, it seems pretty clear that the vivo V50 takes this one too, for its better battery life and faster charging. We recommend the vivo V50 5G for those who want a handset with thinner display bezels compared to something like the A56, a higher IP rating, decent cameras, and better battery life and charging. And that wraps up this comparison review, which team are you guys on for this match-up: Samsung or vivo?
Our coverage of Samsung Galaxy A56 5G vs vivo V50 5G battery life includes: "Samsung Galaxy A56 5G vs vivo V50 5G - Which one’s better?"; "Samsung study finds Galaxy Watch6 can detect early signs of fainting"; "Samsung’s Galaxy Flagship Lineup: Which One Fits You Best?". Each article provides unique insights and information.