Apple Inc. has been involved in numerous patent lawsuits against its competitors. One of its most recent and controversial one, is the patent lawsuit against Samsung. As the trial comes to a close, we want to whose side are you taking?
We’re not going to discuss the technicalities of the trial, but in a nutshell Apple’s patent lawsuit against Samsung revolves around two things, Design and User Interface.
In terms of design, we have to agree devices involved in this trial (25 to be exact, including the Galaxy S and S2) do bare resemblance to Apple’s design in some degree but not entirely. Regarding the user interface, Apple claims that Samsung copied three of their patented technologies for the TouchWiz UI which involves multiple gestures scrolling, zooming and panning and “scrollbackâ€.
Samsung isn’t just going away without a fight as they also file a patent lawsuit against the Cupertino company which involves infringing their patent over 3GPP and Utility technologies and using it on the iPhone and iPad.
Photo credit: Joy of Tech
Of course with any other lawsuit there’s always money involved. The stakes are high for both companies. If proven guilty, Apple’ asking a total over $2PHP 117INR 169EUR 2CNY 15 billion from Samsung for the damages that the patent infringement has caused. As for Samsung, the South Korean tech giant’s asking price for their patent lawsuit is little over USD14PHP 822INR 1,186EUR 13CNY 102 for every iPhone and iPad sold worldwide. iPad units sold alone amass to approximately 67 million as of April of this year, so go figure.
The case was stated, the evidences were presented, and closing arguments were said; now it’s up to the jury to decide whether or not the Samsung is guilty of infringing Apple’s patents or the other way around. It’s going to be interesting to see the outcome of this trial.
Update: A jury just handed down a guilty verdict against Samsung and ordered the company to pay Apple damages to the amount of $1PHP 59INR 85EUR 0.95CNY 7 billion. – Yuga
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
chinitoguy says:
Of course SAMSUNG!!! Apple wants Google’s Android OS destroyed according to Apple’s founder Steve Jobs. Samsung is Google’s biggest and most successful client. They are now the No. 1 mobile phone maker and now poised to overtake Apple in the tablet business.
If Apple wins, Samsung will fall and others are next – HTC then LG then Sony. These are the other manufacturers who support Android.
Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7.5 OS has a small market. But I find their OS very amazing! I own a Nokia Lumia 800 and I’m excited to see the new Lumias with Windows Phone 8. For now it cannot stand a chance against Apple’s iOS with more than 600,000 apps vs Windows Phone with 100,000 apps.
Samsung MUST WIN!
Noir says:
Samsung Side
I cant seem to like a company that patents shape and patent trolls it to everyone. Good thing Apple seems to be the only company that did it.
imagine if others did it like Henry Ford.
When Henry Ford made his car then saw other manufacturers make cars that has similar designs from him.
He probably thought that “These guys are copying my style”.
Good thing instead of suing he went the other way which should be what apple should have done
He went with ” Ok lets make my next design better than all the others”
Jesse Robredo says:
Watch this dudes insights about apple’s litigation http://youtu.be/L1s_PybOuY0?t=5m6s
techie05 says:
im with apple’s side… design, style, samsung just copied it.. just like how koreans copy tech from taiwan and others
Digest says:
I’m with Apple’s side.
Guy Radaza says:
The fact that Apple’s been using Samsung’s chips, they should instead pull out their accusations.
taduL says:
ShAMeSUNG side , Apple iPuke is a mess for me . I’m a fandroid :)
vince says:
“If Apple ends up winning this case against Samsung — and either stops Samsung from releasing their phones and tablets to the market, or charges them a hefty license fee to do so — does anyone really believe that the market will suddenly become more innovative, or that devices will suddenly become more affordable? Similarly, if Samsung wins, do you really believe that Apple will suddenly slow its aggressive development of the iPhone and iPad? It’s certainly not what happened last time they lost one of these cases. ”
http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120820/081930*****/even-if-samsung-apple-copied-every-last-detail-each-other-who-cares.shtml
Mark Chistian Lopez says:
“Picasso had a saying – ‘Good artists copy, great artists steal.’ And we have always been shameless about stealing great ideas.” – Steve Jobs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW0DUg63lqU&feature=player_embedded
(You owe me a giveaway for this awesome comment. A Nexus 7 or Note 5000mAh battery will be nice. ;) )
neojohan says:
This will end up like Apple VS Microsoft. Sooner or later they will be partners.
Whiz says:
Hmmm.., I am currently watching SUITS.., what a great SERIES..,
I can see this as more on MONEY,FAME,MARKET SHARE,CREDIBILITY…, for APPLE..,
Justin says:
“Regarding the user interface, Apple claims that Samsung copied three of their patented technologies for the TouchWiz UI which involves multiple gestures scrolling, zooming and panning and “scrollbackâ€.”
Seriously? Wow! So in effect, Apple is saying that you can only move your fingers that way on our iPads… and on no other tablet! What a stupid patent.
Kit says:
Samsung side all the way.
chinitoguy says:
Additional comment. I don’t care who copies or what. What is important if a tech company like Samsung can make a better product out of Apple’s design as accused.
So far Samsung is doing a marvelous job on making good quality Android smartphones. A friend of mine who is an Apple iPhone and iPad got curious of Samsung Galaxy SIII and Samsung Galaxy Tab 2. He lends a common friend’s Galaxy SIII and Tab 2 for a week. After that he disposed his iPhone 4s and iPad 3 and bought a Galaxy SIII and Tab2. He even bought a Nokia Lumia 800 for his second line. He has amazed how fast Windows Phone is.
Habib says:
Samsung
Kirito says:
Come on, Apple. Why don’t you just stop for a while and realize that Samsung is the one who manufactured some of your chips?
john says:
Apple side, im using samsung galaxy nexus btw..
Dont be blind people, halata namang kinopya ng samsung ang apple nung unang mga release
jb says:
I go with Samsung, all this patent wars are rather silly. Patent for a rectangle =d
Though I have to concede some interface patents were violated.
Marcelino says:
SAMSUNG.
I must admit, mas kampi ako sa Samsung kahit pa I own an iPhone 4S. Grabe ang Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note pag tinabi mo sa iPhone 4S. Madali kasi ako magsawa sa phones, so at that time, I decided to switch to an iPhone from Android.
Samsung – INNOVATIONS BEFORE MARKETING.
Apple – MARKETING. Period.
I might consider going back to Android. Depends on the Galaxy Note 2, Sony Xperia T or Motorola Droid Razr HD.
ishi says:
Samsung side.
Because Samsung they know what consumer wants and needs. Remember Microsoft present before the tablet pc but its was copied by Apple and then claimed it.
Julius from RoundNew says:
Ronnie, I must admit it is really tough to take the side of either one. I would normally side up with Apple because I see why they began this lawsuit in the first place.
But then again Samsung has to win because if it doesn’t then Samsung or any other company will have a tough time making mobile phones or tablets to satisfy every consumer.
I just want to see the two “kiss and make up”. They can discuss a small fee to be paid when a certain patent is used.
garz says:
Apple’s claims are beyond ridiculous. They think they invented the rectangular shape. THey think they invented the home button. They think they invented the touchscreen.
Not a single f*** was given when Mercedez Benz, BMW, Audi, Mazda and Honda made vehicles with four wheels with a circular steering wheel and 6-speed gear. Same with refrigerators, televisions, washing machines, and ovens.
Samsung all the way!
tarush says:
Apple side…
You just go through the history of Apple and Samsung products, even a child would know which are the copycats.
We Filipinos love things that are free, even the things that are considered illegal (‘free’ download of music, movies and paid apps, and when we are asked to buy for those items that we considered “free”, nagrereklamo tayo at ayaw nating magbayad…
That’s what Samsung did with the Apple products, why would they innovate when they could just copy Apple’s patents and sell affordable phones with iPhone like experience?
And they will be paying for what they did…big time.
The jury who would acquit Samsung would be considered blind or have no knowledge about patents at all…
Crimson says:
Samsung copied Apple period. Go and figure out from the time that Samsung came out with their own Smartphone til the time that Apple released theirs. And no, they are not douchebag. They are only protected what they created first. They were the first ones to introduce capacitive screens, when everyone else is using resistive screens, first ones to use accelerometer and everyone followed and first to use all icons on a phone and it just works and then everyone wants to copy it. It’s like seeing a Ford Fiesta on the road with a Cherry tag on it. That’s how I see it.
crimson says:
And have you seen thow mac book pro look alikes from HP, Acer, Sony etc ? People don’t realize that Apple perhaps spent millions of dollars studying those designs, analyzed how people use their phones or for notebooks, best way to utilize keyboards so that it’s enjoyable and useful for everyone before mass producing it and then someone else will just copy that ? Go and figure that out.
paco says:
This lawsuit is not over yet cause the losing side will appeal to the higher court and will continue appealing until they reach the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will then issue the final verdict in regard to this lawsuit.
Hopefully, Apple should win this lawsuit; otherwise, Apple will lose the mobile market share to Android branded phones just like Apple loses the market share of PC to Microsoft in the 90’s after the Supreme Court sided with Microsoft in Apple’s lawsuit against Microsoft.
Werner Larrobis says:
If apple wins, the free OS, the open source idea of the android will take a big hit. The real revolutionary in our time is not Steve Jobs with his cult like showmanship, but closed and his hipocracy regarding his OS that beats its chest in screaming that it will let you free yet crushes you with limiting what you can do to a product that you pay for. The Android OS is a true and silent revolution in itself, letting everyone who has ever had contact with it the freedom to do and to mold it and themselves to what ever they want to. From changing the way their phones work, look and feel to literally do everything from something as simple as letting it be a memory stick, to the android smartphone that can be a movie player, to sharing anything one can think of to friends and family… The IOS cannot and will not allow you to do even a simple exchange of photos or even video clips, memories we cherish we can share via an android phone can be shared to any one or anything even not android phones, be it symbian, or blackberry or a pc.
djk says:
i feel both are great companies.
sum1 has 2 lead
sum1 has 2 follow
i side with what helps the masses = samsung, htc, sony, etc.
sum1 wil start clear glass touch phnes seen in avengers
then again sum1 has 2 follow..
:-)
Christian Pungtilan says:
Apple side but..
Design wise and considering that some apple chip set are from
Samsung they can “copy” since they know what apple products are made of. I’m not really following this patent war, but the the ‘rectangular’ issue against Samsung is baseless. It’s like Samsung should make phones and
tablets in other shape.
Jayson says:
whoever wins – consumers will suffer at the end.
innovation will end if apple wins
i’m on Samsung’s side – i worked in samsung, has a phone and tablet from them also so go figure
Free Innovations says:
Samsung wins:
For “free world” innovations. Democracy prevails.
Apple loses:
Tyranny has gives way to Democracy
Gman says:
The jury are all Americans. Need to say more?
ishi says:
If Apple will win expect the overpriced of their product.
thecorrescode says:
Siri is an innovation? WTF… All Apple did was buy the company, and bake Siri application into iOS and claim it as new. Similar existing application like Vlingo and SpeakToIt has been available to Android way before Siri was introduced by iOS. And by the way, thanks to Siri, Apple has now a technology to support their patent (unified search). Trollness at its finest.
You even consider retina display as innovation? Come on, it is just LCD with higher pixel and nothing more. It is not even Apple’s technology to begin with, but LGs.
iPod is nothing more than just another MP3 player. All Apple did was to make a hype out of it.
And proximity sensor, isn’t those already in existence before Apple’s. And Microsoft own the patent…
3pper says:
For additional news regarding this case: http://www.xda-developers.com/android/the-sleeping-giant-may-have-awoken/
phil says:
Who said that the first galaxy tab was DOA when released? Guess who’s going to jump into the 7″ tab market..
Who said that 3.5″ is just the perfect size for mobile phones? Guess who’s following Samsung for it’s screen sizes..
oldmanjenkins says:
i’m for samsung!!
Chris says:
It is evident that Apple revolutionized the touchscreen, and with all due respects to the other camp, I surely think that Samsung has copied much from it. In fact, Samsung has been doing this for many years already. One example would be the era the of the dual-sliding Nokia N95 where Sammy also created their own version of the trade.
Google has already warned them of the possibility of lawsuits with the way they designed their handsets (Galaxy S, S2?) and hence they are now in the thick of it.
I like Samsung as a brand, but my side is with Cupertino this time.
Stephen Kingston says:
This is the most stupid article that I have ever read in this website! This is an obvious attempt to start a troll war! GET A BRAIN, RONNIE BULAONG!
Edwin C says:
Ako side ako doon sa mananalo.
rene says:
remember the mouse that the Xerox company invented for the PC desktop… everybody is now using it… Steve Job copied it… Xerox did not complain about it… because everybody benefited… Everybody is benefiting from Apple and Samsung… So why kill the goose that laid the golden egg… These two Giant companies are just plain selfish…
mark says:
letting apple win is like killing the blessing of technology and innovation.
also, their patents are way too general, that they resemble elements that can be easily found in nature, available to everyone.
dyonisii says:
i’m for samsung.
a deck of cards is rectangular with rounded corners. they existed long before the iphone.
the palm pilot had icons to represent apps. palm pilots existed before the iphone.
some palm pilots did not have physical keyboards.
apple’s retina display is just marketing. more subpixels in a low-res screen.
touch screen is just innovation/improvement over the use of a stylus.
apple is just over reacting. in fact they hate android so much they’d prolly do anything to kill android. steve jobs said so.
Patent says:
patent wars and troll wars – so non-sense, only lawyers gain something.
Ang says:
APPLE wins! http://live.cnet.com/Event/Apple_vs_Samsung_verdict
rfc says:
jury wins, imagine brand new MacBooks for them, new iPads, maybe even the iPhone 5.
coachjojoc says:
Samsung doesn’t give a hoot about its phones. It gets a fat subsidy from the Korean government and its main products are its chips and lcds.
And on a personal side: ang pinakabastos ay ang mga Koreano. I’ve seen how they treat their “sub-species” workers.
Tujon says:
I hope they both lose so my Optimus L7 doesn’t look bad. I applied for an event on LG facebook page. Hopefully, I can win another one for my girlfriend or it I could win 4X HD for her, it will be superb.
Whiz says:
Hala talo samsung!! Si Harvey Specter siguro kinuha ng apple ahaha
deadpool says:
hahaha talo samsung. gaya gaya kasi eh! buti nga. bayad kayo ng 1 Billion USD.
araxireixian says:
Hahahaha.. Apple is just putting a bad name to Samsung. The Korean brand is a threat to the All American brand they (with components mostly made in Asia lolx). Samsung noted a huge increase in sales over the past few quarters and Apple needs to do something to stop it or they die.
Dont worry Samsungistas the case is subject for revisit according to phonearena. And yes.. Ang kapal naman ng mukha ng Apple to claim these patents.. Their name itself iPhone is not theirs.. If not because of the generosity of Cisco wala sanang iPhone ngayon…
Read:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys_iPhone#section_4