yugatech x infinix

National Privacy Commission issues guidelines for vloggers, YouTubers

The National Privacy Commission (NPC) has released a new set of guidelines concerning the use of body-worn cameras (BWCs) and alternative recording devices (ARDs) by law enforcement and other entities. The new rules, released in NPC Circular No. 2025-01 and effective from June 2025, set strict protocols for the collection, processing, and storage of personal data captured by these devices.

The Circular applies to all personal information controllers (PICs) and processors (PIPs) using BWCs or ARDs, including police, private security agencies, and even vloggers (emphasis ours), when their activities involve the processing of personal data. However, purely personal, family, or household use—such as a cyclist using a camera for self-protection—is generally exempt, provided the footage is not shared online (emphasis ours) or used commercially. (The NPC clarifies that this exemption does not override the fundamental right to privacy.)

Persons using BWCs or ARDs must ensure transparency by providing clear privacy notices—both physically (e.g., signage or device indicators) and digitally (e.g., online privacy policies).

The lawful basis for processing personal data must be established, and the use of recordings must be compatible with declared, specific purposes such as law enforcement, traffic management, or public safety. Proportionality is emphasized: data collection must not be excessive and should only serve legitimate objectives.

Vloggers who record and publish footage that captures other individuals must provide privacy notices and ensure to mask bystanders’ identities, especially children and vulnerable persons.

This mandate could heavily impact vloggers or YouTubers who mostly produce pranks, do street surveys and the likes. They will need to either get permission from the people they are shooting or blur their faces in post-production (including bystanders). We’ve seen some established vloggers are doing this already on their channel but certainly this will be required from everyone from here onwards.

Individuals whose data is captured have the right to be informed, access footage, and request erasure, subject to reasonable limitations, such as ongoing police operations or national security concerns. Agencies must mask unrelated individuals in released footage and provide explanations for any denial or delay in fulfilling access requests.

Violations of the Circular carry potential criminal, civil, and administrative penalties under the Data Privacy Act. Agencies have 60 days from effectivity to comply, and the NPC will conduct regular reviews to keep the guidelines current with evolving technology and privacy best practices.

A copy of the complete circular is published online at the NPC website here 60.

React to this article:
Abe Olandres
Abe is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of YugaTech with over 20 years of experience in the technology industry. He is one of the pioneers of blogging in the country and considered by many as the Father of Tech Blogging in the Philippines. He is also a technology consultant, a tech columnist with several national publications, resource speaker and mentor/advisor to several start-up companies.
  1. This is a good move as I’m sick of going about my business and being caught on someone’s phone camera just so they can get selfies and whatever for their childish Facebook posts and likes

    But on the other hand it’s in public spaces there is no expectation of privacy

    End KF the day we are being recorded everywhere we go be it in a bank or a shopping mall or we are being recorded by cameras stuck on poles in the streets or being caught on dash cams

    Personally I would love to see the end KF this obsession of filming everything and everyone in the streets not only is it frustrating that we can be included in their social media but it’s also an inconvenience when idiots are blocking the way for their selfies ( tho I tend to give the middle finger or just walk between the camera and subject aka photo bombing )


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Community Leaderboard

1 Abe Olandres
Abe Olandres 🥉 Rookie
33,225 3,286 comments
🏆 3
2 EasyE
EasyE 💠 Supremacy
21,060 1,763 comments
🏆 3
3 abuzalzal
abuzalzal 💠 Supremacy
17,440 1,176 comments
🏆 3
4 wew
wew 💠 Supremacy
15,360 1,410 comments
🏆 3
5 Justin
Justin 💎 Platinum
9,190 744 comments
🏆 2
6 Jay
Jay 💎 Platinum
8,450 830 comments
🏆 1
7 BrianB
BrianB 🏅 Newbie
5,980 595 comments
🏆 2
8 Aa
Aa 🥈 Silver
5,675 505 comments
🏆 2
9 Calvin
Calvin 🥈 Silver
5,180 497 comments
🏆 1
10 Benchmark33
Benchmark33 🥈 Silver
5,065 434 comments
🏆 1
yugatech x ASUS

Latest Review

Sleek HUAWEI MatePad 12 X tablet on a dark surface
HUAWEI MatePad 12 X (2026) Review
A person holding the new iPhone 17 Pro Max
iPhone 17 Pro Max Review
Gray Philips tablet with rear camera and flash on metallic finish
PHILIPS 10-inch Tablet (T7305L) Review
nubia Neo 3 GT vs. Infinix GT 30 Comparison Review
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite smartphone on a white background
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite Review

Latest Guide

What’s new with Samsung One UI 8
Smartphones Under PHP 10,000 | Q3 2025
Smartphones Under ₱6K (Php 6,000) | Q3 2025
Xiaomi 15T Pro vs. Xiaomi 14T Pro: What’s different?
List of Xiaomi devices for HyperOS 3 Update Timeline
National Privacy Commission issues guidelines for vloggers, YouTubers » YugaTech | Philippines Tech News & Reviews
Yugatech Logo 2023
YugaTech is the largest and longest-running technology website in the Philippines. Orignally established in October 2002, the site was transformed in 2005 into a full-fledged technology news and reviews destination for Filipinos across the globe.

Tech Guides

YugaTech | Philippines Tech News & Reviews
© 2025. All Rights Reserved.