The Department of Justice has released a second advisory yesterday warning telcos about deceiving consumers on their supposed unlimited internet services.
In a 9-page Advisory dated 09 December 2014, the DOJ expounds that the imposition of fair usage policy on unlimited internet service is inconsistent with the provisions of the Consumer Act, particularly on fair packaging as well as misleading trade practice and advertisements.
Assistant Secretary Geronimo L. Sy, head of the DOJ-Office for Competition (OFC), said that “unlimited data is like unlimited rice or buffet concept – restaurants cannot offer an ‘eat all you can’ promo and when a customer eats more than the average person, to actually stop him or not to honor the commitment.” The Advisory thereby calls on the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) to monitor and penalize non-compliant telcos.
The DOJ, through the Office for Competition (OFC), issued said Advisory in the fulfillment of its mandate to protect consumers from unfair business practices and to advance consumer welfare.
The applicable law that of concern here is RA7394.
Republic Act No. 7394, series of 1992, known as the Consumer Act of the Phihppines (“Consumer Act”), advances the “protection against deceptive, unfair and unconscionable sales acts and practices” as well as promotes the “provision of information and education to facilitate sound choice and the proper exercise of rights by the consumer.”
Article 50 considers an act or practice deceptive “whenever the producer, manufacturer, supplier or seller, through concealment, false representation of fraudulent manipulation, induces a consumer to enter into a sales or lease transaction of any consumer product or service.”
The US Government has also pursued cases against carriers in the United States regarding their promise on unlimited internet.
The copy of the advisory was posted on the DOJ website here.
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
pinpoint015 says:
Tignan nga natin kung ano gagawin ng DOJ sa mga telcos. Kaka-throttle lang ng connection ko kanina kasi heavy user daw ako.. Hahaha
Yousef says:
Globe deserves to be sued for this. An 800 MB/day or 3 GB/month cap doesn’t even make sense. What even.
pong says:
the unli I get from globe is unli-scam, unli-adds, unli-spam
Easy E says:
Sun na lang ang may tunay na unli. Sana wag nang alisin.
gabz says:
PLDT can’t even show me a document which explains their “fair usage policy”. It seems as if they don’t want clients to know exact limits. Also, there’s no way to check usage from their website. Not to mention the 30 minutes it takes for someone to answer their hotline!
a says:
Asan na yung mga mayayabang na mga telco defenders dito? haha
Miss Call says:
This will only make the telcos stop using “unlimited” in their advertising. Take note of the new post paid plans and the lack of “unli”.
Miss Call says:
Also, unlimited “internet” not unlimited “bandwidth”.
archie says:
Gustong gawin ng DOJ ang trabaho nila pero busy ang NTC kakabilang ng under the table payment ng mga telco lobbyists. Dapat kuwestiyunin ng national government ang NTC bakit sila nagpapabaya sa trabaho nila.
Easy E says:
Internet access could be: TIME-based, THROTTLED or CAPPED. Internet use parameters are: TIME, BANDWITDH (data rate/ speed) and (number of) WEBSITES. True unlimited internet access is Time-limited at max bandwidth with access to any site. Anything less than this is not UNLI. Madaya sa ads ang Globe/ Smart. Sun nalang talaga ang nagpprovide ng totoong unli. Kaso minsan forced ang connection para magroam sa smart network. At pag ganun naka roam sa smart network, super bagal ang speed kahit naka set ka sa ‘3G-only’.
Telco Stock Holder says:
ah ganun ba? puro kayo reklamo na mabagal ang internet niyo? so dun kayo mag subscribe ng internet sa DOJ!!!
MVP says:
Ipag uutos ko na lagyan na din ng cap ang Sun bwahahaha! mamatay kayo sa kakareklamo bwahahahah!!
D says:
Hurray to the DOJ for releasing this advisory. Ngayon meron ng isang departamento ng gobyerno na kumakampi sa mga niloloking parokyano ng mga higanteng Telco na ito.
baliwag says:
NTC ang unang dapat managot!
Talamak sa pagkakatalamak ang katalamakang ginagawa nila sa atin.
Gaano ba kahirap ang trabaho sa NTC?
Sigurado ako na mas masipag pa ang pag nganga ni juan tamad kesa sa trabaho ng mga yan.
nice says:
nagpapabayad lang ang DOJ kaya naglabas ng ganito.. parang NTC lang yan, netong nakaraan may ganyan din sila memorandum pero ngayong bayad na sila e di na nila pinush.. corruption at its best.
Pessimist says:
Ang tanong lang ay kung may “ngipin” ba yang advisory na yan o kung wala rin namang effect at dededmahin lang ng mga telco. Dapat sana kinasuhan na lang ng DOJ yan mga yan kaysa sa naglabas pa ng advisory na parang wala rin namang patutunguhan.
ThanksSmart says:
As a Smart postpaid subscriber and heavy user ng youtube sa Smartphone, masasabe ko na wala namang datacap akong na experience. mahaba byahe ko from office to house, kaya wala magawa kundi mag youtube sa shuttle. laking tulong sa matining trafik
nag aaverage ang usage ko per month ng 10-15GB, LTE naman lage.
ewanlangha says:
the creation of this R.A. is one thing
how to prove the unli-capping, etc. is another
how can go to court and sue if you don’t have enough evidence to support it.
di ba mahirap e document yan kung pano kayo napuputol o na to-throttle down speed niyo or when the actual capping occurs?
i very seldom use carriers data connection, coz most of the time i’m not outside my wifi area, both home and in work place, kaya i’ve no long time-experience on mobile data usage.
paolo says:
buti na lang naka free 9999 ako. haha. unli fb talaga. sulit.
steelicon says:
http://visually.visually.netdna-cdn.com/AdvertisingvsReality_4e5e4cbd77c23_w550.jpg
Liars all. WYSINWYG.