infinix x yugatech

Watch: TECNO CAMON 50 Ulltra vs. REDMI Note 15 Pro+ Comparison Review

Listen to article
Subscribe to YugaTech Subscribe

📝 Read Video Transcription
0:00Your options for mid-range smartphones
0:02just got bigger with the release of the
0:03Tecno Camon 50 Ultra. On paper, this
0:07thing almost comes with a full package.
0:09It’s got triple cameras with telephoto,
0:11a pretty solid build quality with IP69K
0:14rating, a nice curved AMOLED display,
0:16and a long-lasting battery life, among
0:19others. In the same price range, you
0:21also have the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus,
0:23offering pretty much the same set of
0:25features with a few differences. It is
0:27the more expensive option, setting you
0:29back 26,000 pesos as compared to Tecno’s
0:3220,000 pesos starting price. With that
0:34price difference, how does the Redmi
0:36Note 15 Pro Plus fare against the Tecno
0:38Camon 50 Ultra? We’ll answer that in
0:40this comparison. I’m your host Earl,
0:42roll that intro.
0:46>> [music]
0:51>> Looking at these two phones, you’d
0:52immediately notice the key distinction,
0:54which is the design. The Tecno has this
0:57vertical camera bump on the left, a
0:59plastic frame, and a glass back rocking
1:01a subtle two-tone finish. Meanwhile, the
1:03Redmi features a square-ish camera
1:05module on the upper middle of the back
1:06panel that’s made of a full leather
1:08material, and also has a plastic frame.
1:11Honestly speaking, I kind of dig Tecno’s
1:13design more. It is visually more
1:15pleasing to the eyes, at least in my
1:17opinion. Not only that, it feels much
1:19more comfortable in the hand. While both
1:21phones have curved edge design, it is
1:23more pronounced on the Tecno, and it’s
1:25also relatively thinner, having a 7.75
1:28mm frame as compared to Redmi’s 8.19 mm.
1:31Also, this might sound like a nitpick
1:33already, but I really don’t like the
1:35additional text here on the Redmi. And
1:37it’s nice to see Tecno not doing the
1:39same. Now, talking about the build
1:41quality, both phones sport the highest
1:43level of ingress protection yet with
1:45IP66, 68, 69, and IP69K ratings, and
1:49drop resistance as well. Although Tecno
1:52has one advantage up its sleeve, the
1:54additional Gorilla Glass 7i on its back.
1:56So, in terms of design and overall
1:58build, I think I’m going to give it to
2:00Tecno. Flipping over to the front, the
2:02difference here is not too obvious. Both
2:04get curved AMOLED panels with a crisp
2:061.5K resolution. The Redmi has a tad bit
2:09larger 6.83-in screen size with 120-Hz
2:12refresh rate, and in contrast, the Tecno
2:14sports a 6.78-in display that runs
2:17technically smoother at up to 144-Hz
2:20refresh rate. It’s not an advantage, per
2:22se. In fact, the 144-Hz won’t be as
2:25useful for daily use since most of the
2:27apps runs at 120-Hz or less. Anyways,
2:30when it comes to the visual experience,
2:32you can expect both phone to deliver.
2:34Their bezels are thin, and the image
2:35appears sharp enough for whatever
2:37content you’re watching. The listening
2:39experience is also close. Both phones
2:41support dual stereo speakers with Dolby
2:43Atmos support, and they both offer loud
2:45and decent sound output. The Redmi even
2:47has up to 400% volume, but at expense of
2:50clarity. So, you may want to keep the
2:52volume below 100% since it’s already
2:55loud enough at that point. As for
2:56biometric security, both get the same
2:58setup with an under-display fingerprint
3:00sensor, that’s optical, by the way, and
3:02of course, face unlock. Nothing fancy
3:04here as both work reliably fast in our
3:06experience. That said, the display
3:08segment ends in a tie. Moving on, let’s
3:10now talk about the performance.
3:12Interestingly, even with largely
3:14distinct chipsets, both phones perform
3:16similarly in synthetic benchmarks. The
3:18Camon 15 Ultra features the MediaTek
3:20Dimensity 7400 Ultra, while the Redmi
3:22Note 15 Pro Plus packs the Snapdragon 7
3:25S Gen 2. Taking a look at our
3:26benchmarks, both phones achieve about
3:28800K in AnTuTu version 11, and that’s
3:31not so bad. While the Redmi may have had
3:33slightly higher scores in Geekbench CPU
3:36and GPU test, the experience is mostly
3:38the same.
3:40>> [music]
3:43>> Both phones are snappy enough for
3:44lighter tasks like scrolling on your
3:46socials, browsing the web, and taking
3:48pictures or video, among others. Gaming
3:51won’t be a highlight here, although both
3:53phones are still able to play casual
3:54games with no issues. We tried playing
3:57non-demanding games and both phones can
3:59handle them quite smoothly at medium to
4:01high graphics. For more graphic
4:03intensive games, however, you may have
4:05to set expectations. Games like Genshin
4:07Impact and Wuthering Waves are playable
4:09on both devices, albeit the gameplay
4:11won’t be as smooth even if the graphic
4:13settings is set to low. As expected,
4:16both phones also warm up a bit during
4:17testing of these games, but not to a
4:20point that it was alarmingly hot. So,
4:22this round ends in another tie.
4:24Here comes the most exciting part, the
4:26camera performance. Tecno has a major
4:29advantage here as it includes a triple
4:31rear setup with a dedicated telephoto
4:33camera. It sports a 50-megapixel main
4:36shooter with OIS, another 50-megapixel
4:38for telephoto, and an 8-megapixel
4:40ultrawide. Up front, there’s yet another
4:4250-megapixel sensor for selfies. On the
4:45other hand, the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus
4:47is left with a dual rear setup
4:48consisting of 8 200-megapixel main
4:51sensor with OIS and an 8-megapixel
4:53ultrawide. Like we always say, a higher
4:56megapixel don’t necessarily mean better
4:58image quality, and it shows. We took
5:01pictures of the same subject side by
5:02side, and it’s a close call in terms of
5:04image quality. Photos taken from both
5:06phones are decent having near accurate
5:08colors, nice clarity, and a respectable
5:11dynamic range with well-preserved
5:13shadows and highlights. The telephoto
5:15camera on the Tecno pulls through with
5:17relatively more detailed shots. This
5:19also means you have wider focal length
5:20to play with, which helps a lot for
5:22taking portraits. For video capture,
5:24both phones can shoot up to 4K at 30
5:27frames per second. However, for selfies,
5:29only Tecno can still shoot at 4K at 30
5:32frames per second, while the Redmi is
5:34limited to 1080p at 60 frames per
5:36second. And now we’re using the Redmi
5:38Note 15 Pro Plus and it’s shooting at
5:401080p at 60 frames per second. So, we’re
5:42utilizing the front-facing camera, and
5:44this is the sample video and audio of
5:46it.
5:47So, peeps, all if you get that, right
5:48now we’re using the Tecno Camon 15 Ultra
5:51and it’s shooting at 4K at 30 frames per
5:52second. So, right now we’re utilizing
5:54the front-facing camera and this is the
5:56sample video and audio of it. Videos in
5:58general look nice for both, but
6:00stabilization is still somewhat a little
6:02shaky at 4K, even though both phones
6:04have OS support. That said, I’m giving
6:07this round to the Camon 15 Ultra, mainly
6:09for having a more flexible camera setup
6:11and generally better image processing.
6:13Battery-wise, both pack a 6,500 mA hour
6:15unit with varying charging speeds. The
6:18Tecno gets a 45 W smart charging and the
6:21Redmi gets a much faster 100 W charging
6:23speed. Weirdly enough, the Redmi is
6:25still not implementing some kind of
6:26wireless charging, in which Tecno has.
6:29From literally having the same battery
6:30capacity and the same performance, it’s
6:33no surprise that both offer roughly the
6:35same battery life as well. In our PC
6:37Mark battery test, the Camon 15 Ultra
6:39lasted 17 hours and 36 minutes, while
6:42the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus passed a tad
6:45bit shorter 16 hours and 40 minutes of
6:47up time. At the end of the day, battery
6:49life still mostly depends on how you use
6:51it and despite the higher charging
6:53speed, it’s not going to be a major
6:55advantage. Therefore, I’m giving this
6:57round a tie. On to the software side,
7:00the Tecno ships with the latest Android
7:0116 with HiOS 16 overlay, while the Redmi
7:04runs Xiaomi HyperOS tree based on
7:06Android 16 as well. Tecno is reportedly
7:08promised to get three major OS upgrade
7:10plus 5 years of security patches and the
7:13Redmi will be a year longer with four
7:14major upgrades and six years of security
7:16updates. This simply means that both
7:18phones will get at least Android 19,
7:20provided both companies will fulfill
7:22their promises. In terms of UI design,
7:24one thing’s for sure, they’re very much
7:26alike. iOS-inspired interfaces and blur
7:29effects are everywhere, except it looks
7:31better and more consistent on the Tecno.
7:33But, Redmi does offer better animations
7:35overall. Connectivity-wise, both phones
7:37cover the essentials, including Wi-Fi 6,
7:40NFC, [music] Bluetooth and an IR
7:42blaster. And happy to report that both
7:44phones already support e-sim. Tecno does
7:46feature what it calls the one-tap button
7:49found on the left side of the phone
7:50facing the screen. What I like about it
7:53is it can automatically analyze whatever
7:55screenshot you took, acting like a
7:56notepad on steroids. The Redmi doesn’t
7:59have anything similar, sadly. Despite
8:01the fact I’m giving this round another
8:03tie since it’s mostly subject as to
8:05which Android skin is better. That’s up
8:07to you. So, after throwing all the pros
8:10and cons about each phone, which one
8:12should you get? The Tecno or Camon?
8:14Well, if you care more about having a
8:16flexible camera experience, a more
8:18premium look, and of course, more value
8:20for money, then the Camon 50 Ultra might
8:23just be the one for you with prices
8:25starting at 19,999
8:27pesos. On the other hand, the Redmi Note
8:2915 Pro Plus sets you back at 25,999
8:33pesos, which is a bit of a hefty price
8:35for what it offers. It’s not exactly the
8:37most powerful mid-range phone out there,
8:40but it’s definitely one that you can
8:41rely on in terms of software support.
8:43So, if you also consider having a phone
8:45from a more established brand like
8:47Xiaomi, then you can’t go wrong with the
8:49Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus. So, there you
8:51have it. What do you think of this
8:53comparison between the Tecno Camon 50
8:55Ultra and the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus?
8:57Are you team Tecno or team Redmi? Share
9:00your thoughts in the comments below. If
9:01you find this video helpful, drop a
9:03like, subscribe to our channel, and
9:05follow us on our socials for more tech
9:07news and reviews. Again, this is Earl
9:09and I’ll see you guys in the next one.
9:12Bye.
⚠️ This transcription is auto-generated from YouTube captions. Some text may not be 100% accurate.

—TITLE— Watch: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra vs. REDMI Note 15 Pro+ Comparison Review —CONTENT—

We know the mid-range smartphone market in the Philippines is getting crowded.

But two new contenders just stepped into the ring with some serious specs.

In this video, our host Earl puts the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra head-to-head with the Redmi Note 15 Pro+.

Both phones promise a lot for their price tags.

But which one actually delivers the better experience for Filipino users?

We’re talking about a price difference of around PHP 6,000.

The Tecno starts at just PHP 20,000, while the Redmi is priced at PHP 26,000.

That’s a significant gap.

So, what are you really getting for that extra cash?

Watch as we test their cameras, displays, and overall performance.

We also dive into their designs, which are surprisingly different.

The Tecno has a sleek vertical camera bump and a glass back.

The Redmi, on the other hand, goes for a full leather finish with a square camera module.

Which one looks better?

Earl shares his honest take, and he’s not holding back.

We also look at the build quality.

Both phones have impressive IP69K ratings, which is rare for this price range.

But there are other subtle differences that might sway your decision.

From the feel in your hand to the extra text on the back, every detail matters.

We break it all down so you don’t have to guess.

This is a showdown you don’t want to miss.

Key differences we explore:

  • Design and build: Tecno’s two-tone glass vs. Redmi’s leather back.
  • Camera setup: Triple cameras with telephoto on the Tecno.
  • Price comparison: PHP 20,000 vs. PHP 26,000.
  • Ingress protection: Both have IP69K rating.
  • Hand feel: Tecno is thinner at 7.75mm vs. Redmi’s 8.19mm.

We know you’re busy, so we kept this video straight to the point.

No fluff, just real-world comparisons.

If you’re planning to buy a mid-range phone soon, this is the video to watch.

Click play to see which one comes out on top.

Trust us, the answer might surprise you.

—EXCERPT— We pit the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra against the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ in a no-holds-barred comparison. Find out which mid-range champ is worth your PHP 20,000 to PHP 26,000. —TAGS— videos, gadget reviews, smartphone comparisons, tech reviews, yugatech, youtube videos, tech trends philippines, mid-range phones, tecno camon 50 ultra, redmi note 15 pro+ —FAQS—

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra available in the Philippines?
A: Yes, it is already available locally with a starting price of PHP 20,000.

Q: Which phone has a better camera?
A: The Tecno comes with a triple camera setup including a telephoto lens, while the Redmi has a different configuration. Watch the video to see our camera tests.

Q: Are both phones water-resistant?
A: Yes, both the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Redmi Note 15 Pro+ have an IP69K rating, which means they are highly resistant to dust and water.

Q: Which one is more comfortable to hold?
A: According to our host, the Tecno feels more comfortable in hand due to its thinner profile and more pronounced curved edges.

Q: Is the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ worth the extra PHP 6,000?
A: That depends on your priorities. The video breaks down the key differences to help you decide.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences in design between the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus?
The Tecno has a vertical camera bump and glass back, while the Redmi has a square camera module and full leather back.
Which phone is more expensive and by how much?
The Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus costs 26,000 pesos, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra starts at 20,000 pesos.
What is the IP rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has an IP69K rating.
React to this article:
Written by
YugaTech

YugaTech

Senior Writer

Contributing writer at YugaTech, covering the latest in technology news and reviews.

View all posts by YugaTech →

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Loading next article...