《2012 年反网络犯罪法》（共和国法案第 10175 号）已于去年 10 月 9 日因最高法院发出的临时禁制令而暂缓执行。最高法院将于 2013 年 1 月听取各方口头辩论，包括提出该临时禁制令申请的 15 名请愿人。
本周，总检察长办公室提交了一份长达148页的评论意见，请求最高法院解除针对《共和国法案第10175号》（R.A. 10175）的临时 restraining order。
政府要求执行《反网络犯罪法》并解除临时保护令的请求，已在GMA新闻的这份报道中详述。
尽管针对《反网络犯罪法》的临时禁令已下达，但过去几个月里，仍有若干博客作者和 YouTube 创作者面临在线诽谤诉讼。
就在上周，一位本地博主因在其博客上发表评论而被一家团购网站以诽谤为由起诉。
然后，上个月，博主兼YouTuber何塞·法鲁吉亚也因在YouTube上上传其与邻居（也是远亲）的口头争执视频，被该邻居以网络诽谤为由起诉。
It’s like how the current (1987) constitution was published and put into effect approximately 6 months.
Establishing the existence of malice in a libel case is really hard. Dunno, but there is no need for this provialsions bec libel is already covered by the civil code.
I’m thinking: why would you upload your verbal altercations online? I mean, seriously! :D
Let’s just forget about the politicians and think about these small, day to day happenings that require a law to back them up when stupid people do stupid stuff against them.
If you have read the description on the YouTube video you would clearly understand why I posted it online.
Hi. Can you site the source for the last few paragraphs?
This is first-hand info. I personally communicated with both.
cite the site? :)
You can find the said video which I was being sued for here – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alsB1vSlLww
Kind of funny how eager they are to enable a law that can so easily be exploited. Rather than rushing to get that TRO lifted, they should iron out the kinks in the law that’s getting everyone riled up.
And it’s because of the upcoming election.
Suit or sued?
Thanks for spotting that!
No prob, sir. :)
they’re insane, They don’t wanna let the people know some of their bad side, tsk, no more freedom… Suing everywhere, just like what Apple is doing right now