YugaTech | Philippines, Technology News & Reviews

Philippines, Technology News & Reviews



Let’s Super PI your PC!


I chanced upon Joey Alarilla’s recent article on Intel Core 2 for gaming over at Hackenslash. He quoted one of Intel’s Executive that the Core 2 can deliver up to 40% better performance than previous generations of CPUs. Did he mean Core 2 Duo can be 40% faster than Core Duo? I think he meant Core 2 Duo vs. the Pentium M.

So I thought why not do an informal survey here and check out the performances of each different systems. We’ll use Super PI as our benchmark tool (download a copy here). The Super PI program calculates the value of pi to the nth decimal, so the shorter the time for your CPU to do this the faster it is.

For this purpose we’ll calculate pi to 2M decimal points. Here are my results:

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 (1.66GHz) : 1 min, 20 secs.
AMD Sempron 3100+ (1.8GHz) : 1 min, 49 secs.
AMD Sempron 2600+ (1.6GHz) : 2 mins, 19 secs.

Intel Core 2 Duo 2.33Ghz : 55 secs. (by Carlo, Macbook Pro)
Intel Core Duo 2.0Ghz : 1 min, 12 secs. (by Kirk, Macbook)
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 (2.1GHz) : 1 min, 10 secs. (by Carlo)
Intel Core Duo T2400 (1.83 GHz) : 1 min, 21 secs. (by Jun)
Intel Pentium 4 3.0 GHz HTT : 1 min, 41 secs (by Jun)
Intel Pentium 4 2.0 GHz: 1 min, 50 secs (by Chad)

Please go ahead and share with us your results. This coul prove to be helpful to those wanting to upgrade their PCs or laptops.

Now, if someone could give me the Super PI results for their Core Duo PCs or laptops, I’d appreciate it. :)

permalink

Enter your email address:

Related Entries:


    36 Responses to “Let’s Super PI your PC!”


    1. Gravatar Icon Miguel replied on Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:28 am (1)

      Is Super PI multithreaded already? If not, run two instances and see if they can them in the same time.

      Me, I’m not foreseeing Core 2 soon. I was tempted to upgrade to go PCI-E video and play a certain game. But when I installed it last night, it still works on my two-year old desktop PC!

    2. Gravatar Icon Carlo replied on Nov 16th, 2006 at 11:23 am (2)

      Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 (2.2GHz): 1 min 10secs

      This is my workstation here in the office hehe* haven’t tested my new macbook pro core 2 duo yet. Will do later and will post another one :D

    3. Gravatar Icon jun replied on Nov 16th, 2006 at 11:32 am (3)

      p4 3.0 with ht - 1 min 52 sec

      core duo 1.83 ghz - 1 min 22 sec

      note: p4 with 2 gb ram, running other processes at the time

      core duo: 512 mb ram

    4. Gravatar Icon jun replied on Nov 16th, 2006 at 11:55 am (4)

      retested it on the core duo notebook: 1 min 21 sec

    5. Gravatar Icon jun replied on Nov 16th, 2006 at 12:09 pm (5)

      retested it on my p4 3.0, got 1 min 41 sec

    6. Gravatar Icon Carlo replied on Nov 16th, 2006 at 7:20 pm (6)

      tested my Macbook Pro Core 2 duo : 55secs

      Does it depend on OS as well? I think so.

    7. Gravatar Icon jayvee f. replied on Nov 16th, 2006 at 7:44 pm (7)

      i was with a fellow journalist the other day and he told me that he just got his hands on to a quad core intel box. its on loan from a computer company :)

      ditch the core 2’s and get the quad cores. coming very soon!

    8. Gravatar Icon Fleeb replied on Nov 16th, 2006 at 8:15 pm (8)

      Intel’s pseudo quadcore (pseudo because it’s 4 cores, 2 cores on 2 separate dies :P) was released already.

    9. Gravatar Icon Chad Manapat replied on Nov 16th, 2006 at 11:20 pm (9)

      Pentium 4 2 GHz, 1 Gig RAM with some other applications running.

      1min 50secs.

    10. Gravatar Icon kirk replied on Nov 17th, 2006 at 4:30 am (10)

      MacBook 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo with 2GB RAM

      1 min 12 sec

    11. Gravatar Icon kirk replied on Nov 17th, 2006 at 4:31 am (11)

      in case you’re wondering, that’s via Bootcamp

    12. Gravatar Icon Carlo replied on Nov 17th, 2006 at 10:07 pm (12)

      I used WINE to run Windows Applications on my Macintosh :)

    13. Gravatar Icon yuga replied on Nov 19th, 2006 at 6:19 pm (13)

      Thanks all for the inputs.

    14. Gravatar Icon Derrick replied on Nov 22nd, 2006 at 10:06 am (14)

      Desktop PC:
      Core 2 E6600 4mb L2cache (2.4GHz) OCed@3.0Ghz

      pi to 2M: 43sec

    15. Gravatar Icon Poltergyst replied on Nov 27th, 2006 at 8:06 am (15)

      heh, using one of the school of architecture’s core 2 duo x6800s @ 2.93ghz with 2gbs of ddr2 and several architecture applications open but doing nothing..43s. damn that’s fast.

    16. Gravatar Icon Andy W replied on Nov 29th, 2006 at 12:06 am (16)

      Lenovo T60 with T5600 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo
      Super PI / Mod1.5 XS

      2M:
      01m 17.156s

      hope this helps,
      AW

    17. Gravatar Icon christian replied on Dec 3rd, 2006 at 8:24 pm (17)

      Pentium core 2 duo E6600 OC’ed to 3.1GHz, 39 seconds

    18. Gravatar Icon Ankan Banerjee replied on Dec 11th, 2006 at 12:30 am (18)

      Compaq V3070TU, with procesor Core Duo T2030 (1.6 GHZ)

      1m36s

    19. Gravatar Icon Kiven replied on Dec 19th, 2006 at 11:01 am (19)

      Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 Merom (1.66GHz) - 1min 20secs

    20. Gravatar Icon Robert replied on Jan 9th, 2007 at 6:36 am (20)

      Toshiba A105 Core Sole 1.87
      1m22 Sec @m

    21. Gravatar Icon TFR replied on Jan 10th, 2007 at 1:08 am (21)

      Mobile Intel Pentium 4
      3.06ghz

      2m 25s

    22. Gravatar Icon Airman replied on Jan 11th, 2007 at 3:31 pm (22)

      Intel “Merom” Core 2 Duo (T7200) on HP dv6000t notebook.

      SuperPi 1.04- Time to calculate 2M Digits= 1.02

      Super 1/Multi-Threaded- Time to calculate 2M Digits= .31

    23. Gravatar Icon Juan Tamad replied on Jan 18th, 2007 at 9:20 am (23)

      Results on my (slow) Pentium D 945, stock speed:

      1 min, 16.469 s

      (using Super Pi 1.5)

    24. Gravatar Icon Zebedeus replied on Jan 31st, 2007 at 1:31 am (24)

      my intel D- processor
      3.0 Ghz

      1:19 for 32Million decimals for PI

      p.s. did i do something wrong?

    25. Gravatar Icon Emjay replied on Feb 12th, 2007 at 4:50 pm (25)

      1.29 Seconds on 2m Super PI. On Acer Travelmate 3260, Intel Core Duo T2300.

    26. Gravatar Icon Carlos replied on Feb 16th, 2007 at 9:35 am (26)

      Core 2 Duo E6400 PC

      Stock (2.13 Ghz)
      55s

      Stock (3.2 Ghz)
      40s

    27. Gravatar Icon Eric replied on Mar 11th, 2007 at 12:17 pm (27)

      Core 2 Duo E6600

      2M digits

      53secs

    28. Gravatar Icon Dave replied on Jun 22nd, 2007 at 8:49 pm (28)

      HP Pavilion AMD Turion TL64×2 w2G ram
      1 min 31 sec .. cpu usage 50-57% ram @39%
      x 3
      with 6 apps open+ live webcam feed 1 min 40 sec

    29. Gravatar Icon Robert replied on Jul 9th, 2007 at 4:33 am (29)

      Intel Celeron D 351 (256 L2 cache)
      1min 11 sec [1M]

    30. Gravatar Icon sant replied on Jul 19th, 2007 at 12:36 am (30)

      Dell inspiron

      Intel pentium dual core T2080
      1 GB RAM
      1 min 38 sec

    31. Gravatar Icon Paulo replied on Jul 21st, 2007 at 9:35 pm (31)

      E6600 O’clocked to 3.0 Ghz …..40 s.. to 2M places

      —————”"—————–…….17s.. to 1M places

    32. Gravatar Icon Josh replied on Dec 30th, 2007 at 4:43 am (32)

      Core 2 Duo E6550@2.33Ghz OC’ed 2.9
      2M - 43 seconds
      32M - 17 minutes 17 seconds…

      Oh yeah :)

    33. Gravatar Icon Jason replied on Mar 4th, 2008 at 10:02 pm (33)

      just passing by..

      Core 2 Duo E8400 @3.0Ghz OCed @3.6Ghz
      1M - 13s
      2M - 32s
      32M - 15m 45s

    34. Gravatar Icon franz replied on Aug 7th, 2008 at 9:08 pm (34)

      Core 2 Duo 1.73Ghz T2080
      1m 47 s

      so slow..haha

    35. Gravatar Icon richz replied on Sep 5th, 2008 at 3:48 pm (35)

      Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 3.7GHz
      1M - 12s
      2M - 32s

    Leave a Reply




    Technology & Computers - Top Blogs Philippines hit counter
    Photos People Chat FREE