The Supreme Court has recently ruled that a 'friends only' privacy at social networking site Facebook does not entitle a user to total or absolute privacy, according to an 18-page decision it released a few days ago. However, the Supreme Court upheld the local Cebu trial court's decision that the school did not violate any privacy issues, as the complainants were not able to provide sufficient and concrete evidence. The Supreme Court said the framework aligns with global best practices and includes safeguards against risks such as bias, misuse, and data privacy violations. Read more in our articles including "Supreme Court: 'Friends Only' privacy on Facebook not private at all" and "Supreme Court approves AI guidelines for court use".
The Supreme Court has recently ruled that a 'friends only' privacy at social networking site Facebook does not entitle a user to total or absolute privacy, according to an 18-page decision it released a few days ago. However, the Supreme Court upheld the local Cebu trial court's decision that the school did not violate any privacy issues, as the complainants were not able to provide sufficient and concrete evidence.
The Supreme Court said the framework aligns with global best practices and includes safeguards against risks such as bias, misuse, and data privacy violations.
Our coverage of facebook privacy supreme court ruling includes: "Supreme Court: 'Friends Only' privacy on Facebook not private at all"; "Supreme Court approves AI guidelines for court use"; "Supreme Court intros eCourt Portal, eFiling to start July 1". Each article provides unique insights and information.