Each year, we look back at all the hundreds of gadget reviews we’ve made and let the numbers decide. Our ranking of the top 25 devices in 2013 is based on their page views.
Though the rankings do not accurately reflect the popularity of the devices, they still represent which ones are top of mind for a lot of consumers. It also gives us an idea which brands make it to the news. For reference, here’s our 2011 top list and 2012 list.
1) Cherry Mobile Flame 2.0 10 (69,000)
2) Cherry Mobile Cosmos Z (63,000)
3) Samsung Galaxy S4 (39,000)
4) Lenovo A800 (37,000)
5) Lenovo K900 (33,000)
6) Cherry Mobile Thunder (32,000)
7) Cherry Mobile Flare 2.0 (32,000)
8) O+ 8.15 (31,000)
9) Starmobile Crystal (29,000)
10) Cherry Mobile Cosmos X2 (28,000)
11) Alcatel One Touch Scribe HD (27,000)
12) Cherry Mobile Cosmos S (25,000)
13) Google Nexus 4 (24,000)
14) Huawei Ascend Mate (24,000)
15) Sony Xperia Z1 (24,000)
16) Sony Xperia Z (24,000)
17) Huawei Ascend G510 (24,000)
18) Alcatel One Touch Idol Ultra (23,000)
19) Cherry Mobile Hyper (23,000)
20) Alcatel One Touch Idol (23,000)
21) Starmobile Diamond (22,000)
22) LG G2 (21,000)
23) Google Nexus 7 2013 (21,000)
24) Cherry Mobile Flare 2X (20,000)
25) Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy (20,000)
Here’s what we can infer from these rankings taken from pageviews starting January 1 to December 31, 2013.
* That the most popular devices are smartphones — 100% of our top 25 devices are all handsets.
* Almost half or 10 out of the 25 are local brands. Cherry Mobile has the most number of popular phones with a total of 8, followed by Starmobile with 2 handsets.
* For global brands, Alcatel took 4 spots while Lenovo and Huawei got 2 each. Both of the Sony Xperia Z and Z1 were also present. The Samsung Galaxy S4 is the most popular handset from a global brand.
2013 is definitely the year of the smartphone!
YugaTech.com is the largest and longest-running technology site in the Philippines. Originally established in October 2002, the site was transformed into a full-fledged technology platform in 2005.
How to transfer, withdraw money from PayPal to GCash
Prices of Starlink satellite in the Philippines
Install Google GBox to Huawei smartphones
Pag-IBIG MP2 online application
How to check PhilHealth contributions online
How to find your SIM card serial number
Globe, PLDT, Converge, Sky: Unli fiber internet plans compared
10 biggest games in the Google Play Store
LTO periodic medical exam for 10-year licenses
Netflix codes to unlock hidden TV shows, movies
Apple, Asus, Cherry Mobile, Huawei, LG, Nokia, Oppo, Samsung, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Infinix Mobile, Pocophone, Honor, iPhone, OnePlus, Tecno, Realme, HTC, Gionee, Kata, IQ00, Redmi, Razer, CloudFone, Motorola, Panasonic, TCL, Wiko
Best Android smartphones between PHP 20,000 - 25,000
Smartphones under PHP 10,000 in the Philippines
Smartphones under PHP 12K Philippines
Best smartphones for kids under PHP 7,000
Smartphones under PHP 15,000 in the Philippines
Best Android smartphones between PHP 15,000 - 20,000
Smartphones under PHP 20,000 in the Philippines
Most affordable 5G phones in the Philippines under PHP 20K
5G smartphones in the Philippines under PHP 16K
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2024
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2023
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2022
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2021
Smartphone pricelist Philippines 2020
jejefrek says:
Epic lenovo k900! Hahahaha naalala ko nanaman! :)) Mabuhay ka abuzalzal! :))) pati mismong founder iyong napahiya hahahaha!
lechon2014 says:
wala na pala masyado nagbabasa ng reviews ng iphones. ala kasing bago eh.
happy 2013s!
anon says:
This doesn’t show accurate results with regards to popularity of one device. You have to consider the date the review has been published.
Say you have Gadget X reviewed last February of 2013 and Gadget Y on November of 2013. If you’re not going to give much time to Gadget Y, doesn’t that sound unfair? X has been waiting for page views for 11 months while Y only had one month.
My point is, each review should be given at least a year to be evaluated for its page view for equality.
Cherhee says:
At it again CM…
I wont blame them for being the top spot…but their phones are being to pretentious… they never had their own look, design wise. Features are also like a fruit cake, mixing good features with bad just to lower their cost…
and now their reaching the 13k+ mark with their phones?! for me id laugh at someone who invested that kind of money to cherry mobile. with that kind of money they could get proven branded midrange smartphone. and save their selves the embarrassment of owning a CM brand.
And dont even argue with that “Filipino ito” “gawang pinoy tangkilikin”
CM doesnt even make their phones here in the philippines..their from china and india just rebranded…
CM should know their boundaries…
chacha says:
cherry mobile should improved their service center, un ganyang kalaki ng volume ng product nila, mahirapan bantayan na quality, if they cant focus on that, ayusin nila service center nila. With lots of products out there, kawawa nman un bibili sa dami na ng may handset, di na magkasya sa service center nila.
vhic says:
sana magkaroon kayo ng review ng Telego W400..thanks
abuzalzal says:
The Cosmos Z is soo laggy I wouldn’t even buy it for Php8k-9k…I pity those who bought this piece of dogpoop and end up getting extremely disappointed.
Huwag kasi magpa-bulag sa 1080p, lol… I would rate this as one of the WORST CM handsets ever…
Theodore Estadilla says:
Where’s the omega hd 2.0?
nice says:
walang myphone lolz
Zobel says:
Nakakalito na ang model range ng CM. It’s not helping them.