Read Video Transcription▼
The Honor 400 Pro is here, and it’s the
brand’s latest premium mid-range
offering, finally equipped with a
flagship chipset, the Snapdragon 8 Gen
3. You know what’s another device that’s
powered by the 8 Gen 3 while under 30K
pesos? Well, that’s the Poco F7 Pro.
Even though they share the same powerful
chip, they’re surely different in a lot
of ways. And with those key differences,
which one would be the better pick?
Let’s dive into the details and find out
in this comparison review. I’m your host
CJ. Let’s jump right to the video.
Starting with how these two phones look.
They both surely have their own sleek,
distinctive style. The Honor 400 Pro
that we got was a gray color and it goes
for a more minimalist vibe with a matte
back. You’ll see the trapezoidal camera
island at the upper left corner housing
three cameras. And the phone has a
curved body. The back panel cribs on the
side and the metal frame itself is
curved all around providing a slightly
more comfortable grip. Meanwhile, on the
Poco F7 Pro, there’s a bit more design
cues happening at the back. We have the
black variant sporting a two-tone finish
with the upper half being glossy, while
the bottom part is matte to the touch.
Taking a closer look, you’ll notice some
design patterns splashed around the
camera island, which comes in a circular
slab housing just two cameras, despite
giving the impression that it has three.
The F7 Pro has a flat edge aesthetic,
also accompanied by a flat metal frame,
which I know some of you may prefer
rather than a curved one. Notably
though, both phones have similar sizes,
measuring just about 8.1 mm, and both
are lightweight as well, weighing more
or less 206 g. For added protection, the
Honor 400 Pro has both an IP68 and 69
ratings for dust and water resistance.
The F7 Pro still has a solid IP68
rating, though. So, design-wise, I’m
leaning towards the Honor 400 Pro’s
aesthetic, as it looks sleeker, more
polished, and offers better ergonomics,
at least in my opinion. The Poco F7 Pro
does give a higher sense of premium
because of that flat edge design.
However, its overall aesthetic doesn’t
speak to me that much. I mean, just look
at them side by side. At the end of the
day, design is subjective, and with each
model having no significant advantage
over the other, then it’s just fair to
give them both a point this round.
Moving over to display, we see quite a
difference here. The Honor Fronted Pro,
of course, comes with a quad curved
screen using a 6.7 in full HD AMOLED
panel. It runs at a smooth 120 Hz
refresh rate and has an HDR peak
brightness of 5,000 nits. As for the
Poco F7 Pro, it features a tad bit
smaller 6.67 in AMOLED screen, but has a
higher resolution of wide quad HD plus.
So, the visuals are a lot sharper on
this one. It also runs at 120 Hz and
offers 3,200 nits of peak brightness.
Another key difference to see here is
the notch. While the PO F7 Pro comes
with the usual punch hole notch, the
Honor 400 Pro comes with a pillshaped
notch. And it’s not just for aesthetics
as it actually houses two camera
sensors. Talking about the visuals, both
phones deliver a satisfying experience.
The colors are nice and vivid with sharp
details, especially for the F7 Pro, and
you get true deeper blacks for both
devices. Their bezels are relatively
thin, and the Honor 400 Pro even gives
the illusion that it has a much thinner
bezel thanks to its curved display,
although they’re not quite uniform as
the chin is a bit thicker for both
models. When it comes to audio, they
both feature dual stereo speakers,
offering a nice sound stage for both
models. There’s an optimal balance
between the highs and mids, and the lows
pack a decent punch. They’re not quite
on par with the flagships, but the audio
experience should be more than good
enough for your entertainment needs.
Interestingly, in biometric security,
only the F7 Pro offers an ultrasonic
under fingerprint sensor, which makes
the unlocking experience slightly
faster, at least on paper. The Honor 400
Pro is left with an optical fingerprint
sensor. For the actual experience,
though, both phones can swiftly
recognize my thumb without much delay.
Again, subjectivity comes into play
whether you’d like curved or flat
screens. It’s up to you. Personally, I
still prefer it flat, so I’m on Poco’s
side for this one. On top of that is its
sharper screen resolution and the use of
an advanced ultrasonic fingerprint
sensor. Thus, I’m giving the point to
the F7 Pro this round. As mentioned
earlier, powering both phones is last
year’s flagship chip, the Snapdragon 8
Gen 3. That said, we can expect both
phones to perform on the same level as
the high-end flagship phones out there,
at least in terms of processing power.
Taking a look at our benchmark results,
we can see that the gaps in numbers
aren’t that far as both phones were able
to get impressive scores. When it comes
to the Ant22 storage though, the PO F7
Pro achieved better results since it’s
running the faster UFS 4.1 storage
technology. Meanwhile, the Honor Fronted
Pro, while still decently fast, has the
older UFS 3.1 tech.
Setting numbers aside, both phones still
feel equally smooth. There’s no hassle
in navigation. All apps run well with
super fast app loading times, and you
can play pretty much any game with these
two. casual mobile games ran flawlessly
and graphically demanding titles ran
really well for both devices. So,
performance-wise, there’s not much to
compare about since the two feature the
same chipset. So, I’m giving this round
the tie. In the camera department, this
is where the Honor 400 Pro really pops
off. It boasts a triparier camera setup
consisting of a 200 megapixel main
shooter with OIS, a 50 megapixel
telephoto also with OIS, and a 12AP
ultrawide. For selfies, it gets a 50
megapixel front camera along with a 2
megapixel bokeh sensor, which explains
the pillowshaped notch. In contrast, the
Poco F7 Pro features a dual camera setup
led by a 50 megapixel main shooter with
OIS and 8 MP ultra wide lens. Up front,
it has a 20 megap selfie shooter. On
paper alone, the Honor 400 Pro
definitely has the advantage, especially
with the amount of flexibility it
offers. While we say that the higher
megapixel count doesn’t translate to
better image quality, the Honor 400 Pro
just takes much better pictures across
the board. This means sharper detail, a
more accurate color reproduction, and
good dynamic range. The Poco F7 Pro
doesn’t skimp on quality either,
especially with its main camera. But
when it comes to ultra wide and zoom
shots, the image quality starts to
degrade, mainly because it’s missing a
telephoto lens. We’re also getting
better selfies out of the Honor 400 Pro
in most cases. As for videos, both
phones do quite well. The detail and
colors are on point with ample amount of
dynamic range and stabilization.
However, as you’d expect, the detail is
far better when shooting at longer zoom
ranges. But be the judge of the quality
yourself with more sample shots right
here.
On the subject of camera performance,
the Omn00 Pro is the clear winner here,
offering a more flexible camera setup
and overall better image capabilities.
Battery wise, both phones pack a 6,000
mAh unit, and based on our actual
experience, these two can last pretty
long throughout the day on typical use.
Just check out our PC Mark battery life
results here. This great battery is
complemented with blazing fast charging
technologies. The PO F7 Pro gets a 120
watt charging, while the Honor 400
Provides a 100 watt charging speed,
which is pretty darn fast if you ask me.
However, only the latter has wireless
charging, and that’s a huge advantage
already. It’s also fast, rated at 50
watts, and it even supports reverse
wireless charging. Sadly, there’s no
bypass charging for both models, so
there’s that. In the battery and
charging segment, I’m giving the point
to the Honor 400 Pro, mainly because it
supports wireless charging that’s fast.
On the software side, both phones run
Android 15 out of the box, albeit with
different Android skins. The Honor 400
Pro gets Magic OS 9 and the Poco F7 Pro
gets Xiaomi Hyper OS2. Both software
have come a long way and are now pretty
much solid in terms of features, UI
design, and even user experience. I
really liked all the aesthetic blur
effects on the system level. The
animations are so good and snappy, and
the UI design is sleek. But perhaps the
major advantage of the Honor for Hunter
Pro is its longevity. Honor promises up
to six years of software support,
including both major OS upgrades and
security. That’s almost close to
Google’s or Samsung’s promise of up to
seven years support. Meanwhile, the PO
F7 Pro still has a decent upgrade pledge
for four major OS upgrades and 6 years
of security patches. Connectivity wise,
both have all the essentials, including
5G, NFC, Wi-Fi 7, and even IR blaster.
Another advantage of the Honor 400 Pro
is the addition of eSIM support, which
is really convenient if you travel a
lot. Therefore, Honor takes the point
yet again this round. Now, we finally
come to the last part of this video.
Let’s talk about the price. The PO F7
Pro starts at 27,999
pesos and 29,999
pesos for the 256 and 512 GB variants,
respectively. As of making this video,
however, Honor has yet to announce the
pricing. But if they fall the same
pricing as last year, then we could
expect the price to go more or less than
29,999
pesos. When it comes down to choosing
which one to get, particularly in this
price range, then the Honor 400 Pro is
highly recommended between the two. It
takes the win by bringing more
flexibility in camera performance, the
inclusion of wireless charging and eim
support, and not to mention a sleeker,
more ergonomic design. The Poco F7 Pro
still stands its ground with a capable
camera performance and a better display,
though it lacks some of the features
like a telephoto lens and the wireless
charging that would otherwise make it a
more compelling choice. I would only
recommend the Xiaomi F7 Pro if you’re
already embedded in the Xiaomi ecosystem
as it offers solid software integration
with other Xiaomi devices. If you’re a
current Xiaomi user, it’s a worthwhile
choice. But for others, the Honor 400
Pro offers better value for money.
Ultimately though, the choice is still
yours. So, what do you think of this
comparison between the Honor from the
Pro versus the Poco F7 Pro? Are you team
Honor or team Poco at least in this
comparison? Share your thoughts in the
comment section below. If you find this
video helpful or informative, give a
thumbs up. Subscribe to tit bell icon so
you won’t miss out on any of our future
uploads. Follow the socials. That’s
Facebook, Instagram, X, and Tik Tok. And
check out.com for the latest tech news
and reviews. Once again, this has been
CJ, and I’ll see you guys in the next
video. Bye. See you later.
⚠️ This transcription is auto-generated from YouTube captions. Some text may not be 100% accurate.
We’ve got a proper showdown brewing in the mid-range arena, and it’s one we’ve been itching to unpack.
The Honor 400 Pro has finally arrived with a flagship chipset, something Honor fans have been waiting for.
But wait, it’s walking right into the territory of another crowd favorite, the POCO F7 Pro.
Both are packing the mighty Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, both are aiming for that sweet spot under 30K pesos, but that’s pretty much where the similarities end.
We took both phones for a spin, and let’s just say the differences are more than skin deep.
From design philosophy to camera capabilities and even how they handle the daily grind, choosing between them isn’t as simple as picking a chipset.
In our latest video, we go beyond the spec sheet and put them through their paces.
Which one has the better screen for binge-watching your favorite K-dramas? Which camera system delivers more ‘wow’ for your food pics and travel stories?
And crucially, which one feels like the better value for your hard-earned peso? We dive into all that and more.
What You’ll See in This Video
- Two phones, one powerhouse chip: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 battle under ₱30K.
- Design duel: Honor’s minimalist curved elegance vs. POCO’s bold, flat-edged statement.
- Camera clash: A triple-lens setup goes head-to-head with a deceptive dual-camera system.
- Display deep dive: Which screen is better for scrolling, gaming, and watching videos?
- We weigh which phone offers better overall value for your needs.
Curious to see which phone came out on top in our real-world tests? Don’t just take our word for it. Hit play on the video above for the full, detailed breakdown and find out which one deserves a spot in your pocket!
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Are both the Honor 400 Pro and POCO F7 Pro officially available in the Philippines?
A: As of this comparison, the POCO F7 Pro is officially available here. The Honor 400 Pro’s local launch details are still to be confirmed, but it’s the brand’s global model, so we’re keeping our eyes peeled for a Philippine release.
Q: Which phone has better water and dust resistance?
A: The Honor 400 Pro takes the lead here with its IP68 and IP69 ratings, offering robust protection against dust and water immersion. The POCO F7 Pro’s official IP rating was not highlighted in our initial findings.
Q: Is there a big difference in their battery life?
A: Both phones are equipped with sizable batteries, but real-world endurance can vary based on software optimization and display tech. We put their battery life to the test in our video, so watch to see which one lasted longer in our usage scenario.
Q: For gaming, which one would you recommend?
A: Both have the same powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip, so raw performance is top-tier. The choice might come down to other factors like cooling system efficiency, software gaming features, and which display feels better to you. We touch on the gaming experience in our review.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply